| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspectivePublic Administration and Policy Group at Wageningen University, art.dewulf{at}wur.nl
Center for Research in Conflict and Negotiation, at The Pennsylvania State University, b9g{at}psu.edu
Department of Communication at the University of California-Santa Barbara, lputnam{at}comm.ucsb.edu
Management and Human Resources at the Fisher College of Business, lewicki_1{at}cob.osu.edu
Communication Science at Wageningen University, The Netherlands, noelle.aarts{at}wur.nl
Organizational Psychology and Group Dynamics at the University of Leuven, rene.bouwen{at}psy.kuleuven.be
Group Communication and Innovation Studies of Wageningen University, cees.vanwoerkum{at}wur.nl Divergent theoretical approaches to the construct of framing have resulted in conceptual confusion in conflict research. We disentangle these approaches by analyzing their assumptions about 1) the nature of frames — that is, cognitive representations or interactional co-constructions, and 2) what is getting framed — that is, issues, identities and relationships, or interaction process. Using a meta-paradigmatic perspective, we delineate the ontological, theoretical and methodological assumptions among six approaches to framing to reduce conceptual confusion and identify research opportunities within and across these approaches.
Key Words: cognition cognitive framing conflict and negotiation conflict frames frame negotiation frames
Human Relations, Vol. 62, No. 2,
155-193 (2009) |
|||