Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dewulf, A.
Right arrow Articles by van Woerkum, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective

Art Dewulf

Public Administration and Policy Group at Wageningen University, art.dewulf{at}wur.nl

Barbara Gray

Center for Research in Conflict and Negotiation, at The Pennsylvania State University, b9g{at}psu.edu

Linda Putnam

Department of Communication at the University of California-Santa Barbara, lputnam{at}comm.ucsb.edu

Roy Lewicki

Management and Human Resources at the Fisher College of Business, lewicki_1{at}cob.osu.edu

Noelle Aarts

Communication Science at Wageningen University, The Netherlands, noelle.aarts{at}wur.nl

Rene Bouwen

Organizational Psychology and Group Dynamics at the University of Leuven, rene.bouwen{at}psy.kuleuven.be

Cees van Woerkum

Group Communication and Innovation Studies of Wageningen University, cees.vanwoerkum{at}wur.nl

Divergent theoretical approaches to the construct of framing have resulted in conceptual confusion in conflict research. We disentangle these approaches by analyzing their assumptions about 1) the nature of frames — that is, cognitive representations or interactional co-constructions, and 2) what is getting framed — that is, issues, identities and relationships, or interaction process. Using a meta-paradigmatic perspective, we delineate the ontological, theoretical and methodological assumptions among six approaches to framing to reduce conceptual confusion and identify research opportunities within and across these approaches.

Key Words: cognition • cognitive framing • conflict and negotiation • conflict frames • frame negotiation • frames

Human Relations, Vol. 62, No. 2, 155-193 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726708100356


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?