| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
The institutionalization of distributed leadership: A ‘Catch-22’ in English public servicesNottingham University Business School, graeme.currie{at}nottingham.ac.uk
Nottingham University Business School, andy.lockett{at}nottingham.ac.uk
University of Leicester School of Management, os{at}le.ac.uk Distributed leadership is promoted as being well suited to public service organizations because of their multiple goals, less pronounced managerial authority and presence of powerful professional groups. Drawing on qualitative evidence we analyse the complex process of the institutionalization of distributed leadership in English schools. Our analysis suggests that competing institutional forces simultaneously foster and stymie the adoption of distributed leadership. Consequently, the school principals find themselves in a classic Catch-22 situation, which they resolve by enacting a weak form of distributed leadership. Ironically, the implementation of distributed leadership is the most difficult in the schools located in socially deprived areas, that is, the very context where policy-makers expect distributed leadership to make the most impact. Moving beyond our specific case, we argue that distributed leadership, and leadership more generally, cannot be divorced from its institutional context and that the relative influence of divergent institutional forces depends upon the immediate organizational environment.
Key Words: distributed leadership • institutional theory • leadership • public services • schools
This version was published on November
1, 2009 Human Relations, Vol. 62, No. 11,
1735-1761 (2009) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
