Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Praveen Parboteeah, K.
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Religious dimensions and work obligation: A country institutional profile model

K. Praveen Parboteeah

University of Wisconsin - Whitewater, parbotek{at}uww.edu

Martin Hoegl

WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management (Vallendar, Germany), hoegl{at}whu.edu

John Cullen

Washington State University, cullenj{at}wsu.edu

The influence of religion as an important element of national contexts has been largely neglected in international management research, even though all major religions promote particular values that believers express at work. In this article, we apply the country institutional profile (Kostova, 1999) to specify cognitive, normative, and regulative elements of national religious contexts and relate them to individuals' work obligation norms. Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) on data from 62,128 individuals in 45 countries, we find support for our hypotheses regarding positive relationships with one cognitive component (importance of God) and one normative component (behavioral aspect of religion). Our hypothesis for the negative relationship between the regulative component (state religion) and work obligation is also supported. We also propose that religious pluralism will weaken the relationships between the cognitive and normative aspects of religion and work obligations. Results provide varying support for the interactive effects of religious pluralism. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of our results and argue for the analytical importance of religion in understanding workplace behaviors.

Key Words: comparative and cross-cultural management {blacksquare}country institutional profile • job/employee attitudes • management • religion {blacksquare}strategic and international management

Human Relations, Vol. 62, No. 1, 119-148 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726708099515


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?