This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Daniels, K. Articles by Wimalasiri, V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Coping processes linking the demands-control-support model, affect and risky decisions at work

Loughborough University, kj.daniels{at}lboro.ac.uk

Nick Beesley

Loughborough University, n.j.beesley2{at}lboro.ac.uk

Alistair Cheyne

Loughborough University, a.j.t.cheyne{at}lboro.ac.uk

Varuni Wimalasiri

Loughborough University, v.p.wimalasiri{at}lboro.ac.uk

As a model of job design, the demands-control-support model (DCSM) indicates that dynamic processes involving individual agency underpin the effects of job characteristics. Specifically, the DCSM indicates that control and social support facilitate effective coping with work demands. To examine such processes in detail, 32 nuclear design engineers participated in an experience sampling study (number of observations = 456). Findings indicate that enacting problem-focused coping by control and support across situations may be beneficial for affect. Problem-focused coping enacted by control was also related to fewer decisions that bear risks to design safety. Although higher levels of risky decisions were related to consistent use of emotional-approach enacted by control coping across situations, this form of coping used in specific demanding episodes was related to less cognitive error and fewer risky decisions two hours later. Emotional-approach enacted through support in specific episodes had a mixed pattern of relationships with outcomes. Theoretically, the findings indicate the importance of understanding the purpose for which job characteristics are enacted. Practically, the findings indicate the importance of shaping both problem-solving and emotional processes alongside job redesign.

Key Words: coping • demands-control-support model • job characteristics • job design • risk • safety • well-being

Human Relations, Vol. 61, No. 6, 845-874 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726708093543


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?