Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGivern, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ferlie, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Playing tick-box games: Interrelating defences in professional appraisal

Gerry McGivern

School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, gerry.mcgivern{at}rhul.ac.uk

Ewan Ferlie

Centre for Public Services Organizations at the School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, ewan.ferlie{at}rhul.ac.uk

We here examine the introduction of appraisal for senior medical professionals. Our recent qualitative field research found four main experiences of appraisal (developmental, disappointed reflection, defensive assessment and cynical dismissal of appraisal as a waste of time), which we developed into a typology. We argue many professionals `play tick-box games' to give the impression of auditable practice while continuing to practise in a traditional way. We develop existing theory on the `audit society', social defences and `mock bureaucracy' to explain interrelating defences which occur in appraisal as a reaction to the risks and conflict experienced in professional regulation.

Key Words: appraisal • audit • consultant appraisal • medical professionals • mock bureaucracy • new public management

Human Relations, Vol. 60, No. 9, 1361-1385 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726707082851
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
U. Eriksson-Zetterquist, K. Lindberg, and A. Styhre
When the good times are over: Professionals encountering new technology
Human Relations, August 1, 2009; 62(8): 1145 - 1170.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
G. McGivern
Book Review: Organized Uncertainty Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management by Michael Power. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007. {pound}24.99. 275pp. ISBN 0199253944
Organization, May 1, 2008; 15(3): 469 - 472.
[PDF]