Human Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Myers, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human Relations, Vol. 60, No. 4, 609-636 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726707078352

Themed article: Sexed up intelligence or irresponsible reporting? The interplay of virtual communication and emotion in dispute sensemaking

Piers Myers

London South Bank University, piers.myers{at}lsbu.ac.uk

In the context of an exploratory case study of an interorganizational dispute between the BBC and the UK Government, this article develops a conceptual framework through which the interplay of emotion, sensemaking and virtuality in disputes can be better understood. One contribution of the article is reconsideration of the general relationship between emotion and sensemaking. It is suggested that emotions as temporary social roles complement sensemaking itself, enabling plausible accounts to be constructed when there would otherwise be no socially acceptable bridge between beliefs and behaviour. A second contribution is appreciation of the difficulties for virtual communication arising from the capabilities for review and replication of messages which it affords, so that discourse is explicit, irrevocable and potentially public. When, particularly across the lines of a dispute, communications are contentious this can lead to sensemaking through behavioural commitment and the evocation of justifying beliefs; or it can lead to emotional dynamics justifying communication as passion or obviating the need to attend to other's responses. The ar ticle reflects on implications for the development, escalation and resolution of disputes.

Key Words: BBC and UK Government • disputes • emotion • Hutton Inquir y • organizational discourse • organization theory • politics and the media • sensemaking • virtuality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?