This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Chia, R. Articles by MacKay, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice

University of Aberdeen Business School, UK, rchia{at}abdn.ac.uk

Brad MacKay

International Management, University of St Andrews’ School of Management, UK, rbm2{at}st-andrews.ac.uk

The recent turn to ‘strategy practice’ offers a genuine opportunity for establishing an alternative perspective that is clearly distinct from the traditional strategy process view. The challenge is to clarify and articulate an alternative set of ontological and epistemological premises for founding this new approach to theorizing strategy.What has been called the ‘practice turn’ in social theory provides this alternative basis for a ‘post-processual’ approach to theorizing strategy-as-practice. This ‘practice turn’ involves a radical reformulation of the intractable problem of agency and structure that enables us to bypass the ‘micro/macro’ distinction so intimately tied to the social sciences in general and to strategy research in particular. Already, there are signs that the discourse of the strategy-as-practice research community reflects this awareness and are thus straining towards some form of ‘trans-individual’ explanation that is not restricted to the mere ‘activities’ of strategy actors nor to the traditional emphasis on macro-structures and processes. This article contributes to the clarification of some of the underlying premises of current strategy theorizing and shows how the strategy-as-practice perspective can further differentiate itself from the strategy process view. From the social practices viewpoint, everyday strategy practices are discernible patterns of actions arising from habituated tendencies and internalized dispositions rather than from deliberate, purposeful goal-setting initiatives. We term this epistemological stance ‘post-processual’. Such a post-processual world-view offers a revised understanding of strategy emergence that has profound explanatory implications for the strategy-as-practice movement.

Key Words: dwelling • immanent logic • methodological individualism • post-processual • sociality of inertia • trans-individual

Human Relations, Vol. 60, No. 1, 217-242 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726707075291


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Geiger Revisiting the Concept of Practice: Toward an Argumentative Understanding of Practicing Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 129 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Carroll, L. Levy, and D. Richmond Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm Leadership, November 1, 2008; 4(4): 363 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Jarzabkowski and D. Seidl The Role of Meetings in the Social Practice of Strategy Organization Studies, November 1, 2008; 29(11): 1391 - 1426. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Regner Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy Human Relations, April 1, 2008; 61(4): 565 - 588. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Araujo, H. Kjellberg, and R. Spencer Market practices and forms: introduction to the special issue Marketing Theory, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 5 - 14. [PDF]

				A. Langley Process thinking in strategic organization Strategic Organization, August 1, 2007; 5(3): 271 - 282. [PDF]