Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendry, J.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Owners or traders? Conceptualizations of institutional investors and their relationship with corporate managers

John Hendry

Reading University Business School, UK, j.hendry{at}reading.ac.uk

Paul Sanderson

University of Cambridge, Centres for Business Research, UK, p.sanderson{at}cbr.cam.ac.uk

Richard Barker

Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, UK, Jj.backer{at}jbs.cam.ac.uk

John Roberts

Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, UK, j.roberts{at}jims.cam.ac.uk

We draw on a series of in-depth interviews with senior managers from institutional investors and large listed corporations to explore how different conceptualizations of institutional investors, their role in the corporate governance process, and their interactions with corporate management, are reflected in the accounts of the actors concerned. We find that the conceptualizations in terms of ownership and agency that dominate both academic and popular discourses are marginal to the actors’ accounts. Rather, both fund managers and company managers conceptualize institutional investors primarily as financial traders who happen,as a result of their trading, to control key resources, but whose interests are effectively divorced from those of long-term share owners. Our analysis suggests that far from being mitigated by the large share blocks of institutional investors, as some commentators have suggested, the separation of ownership from control has been compounded in the UK by a separation of accountability from responsibility, with the interests of the institutions holding managers accountable being quite different from those of the owner-beneficiaries to whom they feel responsible. This raises significant challenges for corporate governance policy as well as new issues for research into the governance process.

Key Words: accountability • corporate governance • institutional investors • shareholder value

Human Relations, Vol. 59, No. 8, 1101-1132 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726706068793


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
A. J. Ward, J. A. Brown, and S. D. Graffin
Under the spotlight: institutional investors and firm responses to the Council of Institutional Investors' Annual Focus List
Strategic Organization, May 1, 2009; 7(2): 107 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
R. Dharwadkar, M. Goranova, P. Brandes, and R. Khan
Institutional Ownership and Monitoring Effectiveness: It's Not Just How Much but What Else You Own
Organization Science, May 1, 2008; 19(3): 419 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]