Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Runté, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mills, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cold War, chilly climate: Exploring the roots of gendered discourse in organization and management theory

Mary Runté

University of Lethbridge, Canada, mary.runte{at}uleth.ca

Albert J. Mills

Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary’s University, Canada, albert.mills{at}smu.ca

Prior to the mid-1970s, gender was virtually absent from theories of management and organization (OMT), particularly within the North American context. In recent years, four strands of research have brought gender into management theory - gender and organizations, women in management, work-family conflict, and diversity management - but largely in ways that reinforce the masculinist project. With the exception of the more critical gender and organizations approach, gender continues to be discussed in OMT in ways that privilege masculinity and problematize femininity. This is particularly true of the work-family conflict literature and, to a lesser extent, the women in management literature. In this article, we are interested in the root of the gendered discourse within OMT. Through a feminist hermeneutic excavation of the development of modern OMT in post-war USA, we conclude that the continued masculinist project owes much to Cold War discourses of family and work

Key Words: Cold War • discourse • gender in organizations • management theory • work & family

Human Relations, Vol. 59, No. 5, 695-720 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726706066174


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
M. Tadajewski
The Politics of the Behavioural Revolution in Organization Studies
Organization, September 1, 2009; 16(5): 733 - 754.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
A. Trethewey and H.L. Goodall JR
Leadership Reconsidered as Historical Subject: Sketches from the Cold War to Post-9/11
Leadership, November 1, 2007; 3(4): 457 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]