Human Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human Relations, Vol. 59, No. 3, 267-290 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726706064171

Rethinking job characteristics in work stress research

Kevin Daniels

Loughborough University, UK;k.j.daniels{at}lboro.ac.uk

In work stress research, consistent relationships between job characteristics and strain have not been established across methods for assessing job characteristics. By examining the methods used to assess job characteristics in work stress research, I argue that this is because different methods are assessing interrelated, yet distinct, facets of job characteristics: latent, perceived and enacted facets. The article discusses the implications for work stress research of differentiating these facets of job characteristics.

Key Words: job characteristics • measurements • stress • stressors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
K. Daniels, N. Beesley, A. Cheyne, and V. Wimalasiri
Coping processes linking the demands-control-support model, affect and risky decisions at work
Human Relations, June 1, 2008; 61(6): 845 - 874.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
G. Currie, R. Finn, and G. Martin
Accounting for the `dark side' of new organizational forms: The case of healthcare professionals
Human Relations, April 1, 2008; 61(4): 539 - 564.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
C. Coupland, A. D. Brown, K. Daniels, and M. Humphreys
Saying it with feeling: Analysing speakable emotions
Human Relations, March 1, 2008; 61(3): 327 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
R. Loveridge, P. Willman, and S. Deery
60 years of Human Relations
Human Relations, December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1873 - 1888.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
K. Daniels, R. Hartley, and C. J. Travers
Beliefs about stressors alter stressors' impact: Evidence from two experience-sampling studies
Human Relations, September 1, 2006; 59(9): 1261 - 1285.
[Abstract] [PDF]