Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sydow, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Network Development by Means of Network Evaluation? Explorative Insights from a Case in the Financial Services Industry

Jörg Sydow

Free University of Berlin, sydow{at}wiwiss.fu-berlin.de

This article reports on the case of a network of industrial insurance brokers that has been the subject of a longitudinal study over a period of 10 years. Among other things, the development of this network has been observed with respect to when and how it was evaluated, and what effects this evaluation had on the evolution of the network. In this respect, it is one of the very few studies to have investigated evaluation practices in interorganizational networks. The case shows that, on the one hand, ‘reflexive monitoring’ (Giddens) is a common practice and a necessary condition for organizing and managing networks, and, on the other hand, more formal evaluation procedures, which are supportive to network development at some point in time, may not always be possible or even necessary. This insight does not contradict the thesis that we are increasingly moving towards an ‘auditing society’ (Power). However, it highlights questions regarding the general demands for a more or less permanent evaluation of organizational forms. With regard to evaluating practices, and as suggested by the structuration approach on which the analysis is based, the case questions our all too linear understandings of network evolution.

Key Words: evaluation • evolution • financial services • network • network development • service industry • structuration theory

Human Relations, Vol. 57, No. 2, 201-220 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726704042927


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
J. Raab and P. Kenis
Heading Toward a Society of Networks: Empirical Developments and Theoretical Challenges
Journal of Management Inquiry, September 1, 2009; 18(3): 198 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
K. G. Provan, A. Fish, and J. Sydow
Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks
Journal of Management, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 479 - 516.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
I. Winkler
Network Governance Between Individual and Collective Goals: Qualitative Evidence from Six Networks
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2006; 12(3): 119 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]