Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callahan, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reversing a conspicuous absence: Mindful inclusion of emotion in structuration theory

Jamie L. Callahan

Texas A&M University, jcallahan{at}tamu.edu

As the concept of emotion in organizations gains popularity in both research and practice, the danger of atheoretical application grows. Scholars of emotion in organizations have begun to refer to Giddens’ (1979) structuration theory as potentially relevant for the phenomenon of emotion. This article demonstrates how existing research on emotion can be framed in the context of emotion structuration that depicts how emotions both structure and are structured by social systems. Unlike Giddens’ structuration theory, which does not address the role of emotion in social systems and structures, emotion structuration explicitly focuses on emotion. Essentially, emotion structuration is an attempt to reframe Giddens’ work to describe the process of how emotions and social contexts interact and, as a result, modify each other.

Key Words: emotion • social system • structuration

Human Relations, Vol. 57, No. 11, 1427-1448 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726704049416
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Violence Against WomenHome page
J. L. Callahan
Manifestations of Power and Control: Training as the Catalyst for Scandal at the United States Air Force Academy
Violence Against Women, October 1, 2009; 15(10): 1149 - 1168.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
Z. Hussain and K. Hafeez
Changing Attitudes and Behavior of Stakeholders During an Information Systems-Led Organizational Change
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2008; 44(4): 490 - 513.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
C. Coupland, A. D. Brown, K. Daniels, and M. Humphreys
Saying it with feeling: Analysing speakable emotions
Human Relations, March 1, 2008; 61(3): 327 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational Management Administration LeadershipHome page
C. James, M. Connolly, G. Dunning, and T. Elliott
Systemic Leadership for Schools and the Significance of Systemic Authorization
Educational Management Administration Leadership, October 1, 2007; 35(4): 573 - 588.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
B. Sieben
Themed article: Doing research on emotion and virtual work: A compass to assist orientation
Human Relations, April 1, 2007; 60(4): 561 - 580.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Action ResearchHome page
H. Heen
About feelings in action research: An experiment in first-person inquiry
Action Research, September 1, 2005; 3(3): 263 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]