Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Contu, A.
Right arrow Articles by örtenblad, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Against Learning

Alessia Contu

Department of Management Learning at Lancaster University, a.contu{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Christopher Grey

University of Cambridge, UMIST

Anders örtenblad

Halmstad University, in Sweden, anders.ortenblad{at}set.hh.se

This article is a critique of the broad ensemble which we identify as `learning discourse' and its pervasive ideological content which determines learning as a `good thing for all'. We consider how the signifier `learning' works as a nodal point which constitutes (legitimizes and sustains), yet glosses over, antagonistic and contradictory organizational and social practices. With our critique we endeavour to go beyond a simple rebuke or rebuttal. We, rather, point out the problematic nature of the truths engendered in `making the social' and constituting the promise of a learning society whose ambit encompasses learning in general, the learning organization and the political economy of the `knowledge economy'. By doing so we expose the political character of the learning discourse which, we argue, works as the surface of intelligibility pro-posing the reality of work, self-hood, citizenship and society. We antagonize its `no alternative' trope by questioning the equivalence it creates between social inclusion, competitiveness, employability, empowerment and personal development. Our critique makes explicit how it is possible, and why it is important, to be `against learning'.

Key Words: critique • discourse • knowledge • learning • organizational learning • politics

Human Relations, Vol. 56, No. 8, 931-952 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/00187267030568002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Sturdy
Popular Critiques of Consultancy and a Politics of Management Learning?
Management Learning, September 1, 2009; 40(4): 457 - 463.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. G. Cullen
How to sell your soul and still get into Heaven: Steven Covey's epiphany-inducing technology of effective selfhood
Human Relations, August 1, 2009; 62(8): 1231 - 1254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management & Organizational HistoryHome page
C. Grey and A. Sturdy
Historicising knowledge-intensive organizations: The case of Bletchley Park
Management & Organizational History, May 1, 2009; 4(2): 131 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
I. Nonaka and G. von Krogh
Perspective--Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory
Organization Science, May 1, 2009; 20(3): 635 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
S. Gherardi
Introduction: The Critical Power of the `Practice Lens'
Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 115 - 128.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. Driver
New and Useless: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Organizational Creativity
Journal of Management Inquiry, September 1, 2008; 17(3): 187 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. Messner, S. Clegg, and M. Kornberger
Critical Practices in Organizations
Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 2008; 17(2): 68 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human Resource Development ReviewHome page
P. Tosey and J. Mathison
Do Organizations Learn? Some Implications for HRD of Bateson's Levels of Learning
Human Resource Development Review, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 13 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Rowe
Unfolding the Dance of Team Learning: A Metaphorical Investigation of Collective Learning
Management Learning, February 1, 2008; 39(1): 41 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. Sturdy, M. Brocklehurst, D. Winstanley, and M. Littlejohns
Management as a (Self) Confidence Trick: Management Ideas, Education and Identity Work
Organization, November 1, 2006; 13(6): 841 - 860.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Styhre, P.-E. Josephson, and I. Knauseder
Organization Learning in Non-writing Communities: The Case of Construction Workers
Management Learning, March 1, 2006; 37(1): 83 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
D. S. Griffiths, D. Winstanley, and Y. Gabriel
Learning Shock: The Trauma of Return to Formal Learning
Management Learning, September 1, 2005; 36(3): 275 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
Y. Gabriel
MBA and the Education of Leaders: The New Playing Fields of Eton?
Leadership, June 1, 2005; 1(2): 147 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Sturdy, T. Clark, R. Fincham, and K. Handley
Silence, Procrustes and Colonization: A Response to Clegg et al.'s 'Noise, Parasites and Translation: Theory and Practice in Management Consulting'
Management Learning, August 1, 2004; 35(3): 337 - 340.
[PDF]