Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geppert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Change Management in MNCs: How Global Convergence Intertwines with National Diversities

Mike Geppert

m.geppert{at}swansea.ac.uk

Dirk Matten

International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility at Nottingham University Business School, dirk.matten{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Karen Williams

European Business Management School, University of Wales, Swansea, k.williams{at}swan.ac.uk

This article presents case studies of three of the four global players in the lifts and escalator industry (controlling three-quarters of the respective world market). It is based on chiefly qualitative data from headquarters level (based in the US, Finland and Germany) and comparative data from their British and German subsidiaries. The object of the research is change management processes in the work systems at subsidiary level. The central research question of the study is to analyse how these processes are shaped by globalization on the one hand and national institutional contexts on the other hand. In doing so, the authors position their research between the two dominant families of approaches in international business research, recently characterized by Child as `low-context' and `high-context' approaches. The study is process- (rather than structure-) oriented and shows how global and national effects shape the design of the work systems at the subsidiary level and reveals that there is no one best way of globalizing in MNCs. The analysis in this article focuses on the cross-national comparison of the subsidiaries, but at the same time highlights the relevance of the societal institutions of MNCs' home countries as well.

Key Words: Anglo-German comparison • change management in MNCs • national institutions

Human Relations, Vol. 56, No. 7, 807-838 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/00187267030567003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Geppert, D. Matten, and P. Walgenbach
Transnational institution building and the multinational corporation: An emerging field of research
Human Relations, November 1, 2006; 59(11): 1451 - 1465.
[PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
P. Gooderham, O. Nordhaug, and K. Ringdal
National embeddedness and calculative human resource management in US subsidiaries in Europe and Australia
Human Relations, November 1, 2006; 59(11): 1491 - 1513.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
G. Delmestri
Streams of inconsistent institutional influences: Middle managers as carriers of multiple identities
Human Relations, November 1, 2006; 59(11): 1515 - 1541.
[Abstract] [PDF]