Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, P. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sensations, Bodies, and the ‘Spirit of a Place’: Aesthetics in Residential Organizations for the Elderly

Patricia Yancey Martin

Florida State University, pmartin{at}coss.fsu.edu

This article uses data collected in the 1970s and 1980s from old people’s homes (OPHs) in the United Kingdom to explore how aesthetics are organized in residential organizations for the elderly. The analysis reviews the sensations to which OPH members are subjected and reveals the role of power in organizing aesthetic experiences. Paradoxes associated with framing residential organizations as homes and with controlling residents’ bodies are explored. I focus on the senses of smell, sight, touch, and sound with attention to staff and residents’ views of residents’ bodily messes and their constructions of residents’ death and dying. In exploring the ‘spirit of a place,’ I differentiate homey from institutional facilities (as ideal types) by noting their physical, cultural, and social attributes. In a section on socially constructing residents’ bodies, I explore how homey (more than institutional) OPHs use power to enhance residents’ dignity and rights. Conclusions affirm the value of placing the ethnographer and her bodily sensations inside the story and the need for more research on smells and power’s role in creating a positive spirit in residential organizations for the elderly.

Key Words: aesthetic judgments • ambiance • ‘bodily messes’ • body politics • ethnography • institutional vs homey ‘spirit’

Human Relations, Vol. 55, No. 7, 861-885 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726702055007544


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
S. Gherardi
Practice? It's a Matter of Taste!
Management Learning, November 1, 2009; 40(5): 535 - 550.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. Hockey
'Switch on': sensory work in the infantry
Work Employment Society, September 1, 2009; 23(3): 477 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
P. Gagliardi
The Collective Repression of `Pathos' in Organization Studies
Organization, May 1, 2007; 14(3): 331 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
K. S. Mack
Senses of Seascapes: Aesthetics and the Passion for Knowledge
Organization, May 1, 2007; 14(3): 373 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. Strati
Designing Organizational Life as 'Aesth-hypertext': Insights to Transform Business Practice
Organization, November 1, 2005; 12(6): 919 - 923.
[PDF]