Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tourish, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pinnington, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Transformational Leadership, Corporate Cultism and the Spirituality Paradigm: An Unholy Trinity in the Workplace?

Dennis Tourish

University of Aberdeen, D.Tourish{at}abdn.ac.uk

Ashly Pinnington

University of Queensland, School of Management, A.Pinnington{at}gsm.uq.edu.au

Leadership is a perennially popular topic in the academic and practitioner literature on management. In particular, the past twenty years have witnessed an explosive growth of interest in what has been termed ‘transformational leadership’ (henceforth, TL). The theory is closely linked to the growth in what has been defined as corporate culturism - an emphasis on the importance of coherent cultures, as a means of securing competitive advantage. This article outlines the central components of TL theory, and subjects the concept to a critical analysis. In particular, similarities are identified between the components concerned and the characteristics of leadership practice in organizations generally defined as cults. This connection has been previously unremarked in the literature. These similarities are comprehensively reviewed. Trends towards what can be defined as corporate cultism in modern management practice are also discussed. We conclude that TL models are overly concerned with the achievement of corporate cohesion to the detriment of internal dissent. Such dissent is a vital ingredient of effective decision-making. It is suggested that more inclusive and participatory models of the leadership process are required.

Key Words: cults/undue social influence • transformational/transactional influence

Human Relations, Vol. 55, No. 2, 147-172 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726702055002181


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S. K. Robinson and R. Kerr
The symbolic violence of leadership: A critical hermeneutic study of leadership and succession in a British organization in the post-Soviet context
Human Relations, June 1, 2009; 62(6): 875 - 903.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. C. Schippers, D. N. Den Hartog, P. L. Koopman, and D. van Knippenberg
The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity
Human Relations, November 1, 2008; 61(11): 1593 - 1616.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
D. Tourish
Challenging the Transformational Agenda: Leadership Theory in Transition?
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 21(4): 522 - 528.
[PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. Amernic, R. Craig, and D. Tourish
The transformational leader as pedagogue, physician, architect, commander, and saint: Five root metaphors in Jack Welch's letters to stockholders of General Electric
Human Relations, December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1839 - 1872.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
D. Tourish
Themed book reviews: Communication, discourse and leadership
Human Relations, November 1, 2007; 60(11): 1727 - 1740.
[PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
M. C. Bligh and B. Schyns
Leading Question: The Romance Lives On: Contemporary Issues Surrounding the Romance of Leadership
Leadership, August 1, 2007; 3(3): 343 - 360.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Human ValuesHome page
M. Singhal and L. Chatterjee
A Person-Organization Fit-based Approach for Spirituality at Work: Development of a Conceptual Framework
Journal of Human Values, October 1, 2006; 12(2): 161 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
D. Tourish and N. Vatcha
Charismatic Leadership and Corporate Cultism at Enron: The Elimination of Dissent, the Promotion of Conformity and Organizational Collapse
Leadership, November 1, 2005; 1(4): 455 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. A. Morris, C. M. Brotheridge, and J. C. Urbanski
Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility
Human Relations, October 1, 2005; 58(10): 1323 - 1350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
A. M. Jones
The Anthropology of Leadership: Culture and Corporate Leadership in the American South
Leadership, September 1, 2005; 1(3): 259 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]