Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Driver, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Learning Organization: Foucauldian Gloom or Utopian Sunshine?

Michaela Driver

East Tennessee State University, drdriver{at}earthlink.net

Based on Coopey’s critical review of the terms ‘Utopian sunshine’ and ‘Foucauldian gloom’ with regard to the learning organization (Coopey, 1998), this article explores the learning organization from two opposing perspectives. While researchers agree that the learning organization concept is an important one for organization science, two seemingly irreconcilable research communities are arguing about whether the learning organization is a dream or a nightmare for its members, particularly with regard to three critical dimensions: control, ideology and potentially painful employee experiences. The purpose of this article is to review and critically examine both the optimistic view of the learning organization as positive ideal and the more critical view of the learning organization as negative ideology. Based on this examination, the article aims to synthesize a new middle-ground perspective on the learning organization, referred to as the ‘fluorescent light’ view, incorporating elements from both optimistic and critical views in hopes of generating a dialog between them that will provide new research questions on control, ideology and potential pain in learning organizations.

Key Words: critical perspective • ideology • learning organization • organizational control • painful experiences

Human Relations, Vol. 55, No. 1, 33-53 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726702055001605


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Global Business ReviewHome page
D. Akella
Discipline and Negotiation: Power in Learning Organizations
Global Business Review, August 1, 2008; 9(2): 219 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Rowe
Unfolding the Dance of Team Learning: A Metaphorical Investigation of Collective Learning
Management Learning, February 1, 2008; 39(1): 41 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Global Business ReviewHome page
D. Akella
Pain and Stress in Learning Organizations: A Question of Career?
Global Business Review, December 1, 2007; 8(2): 323 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Global Business ReviewHome page
D. Akella
Learning Organizations: Managerial Control Systems?
Global Business Review, February 1, 2007; 8(1): 13 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Styhre, P.-E. Josephson, and I. Knauseder
Organization Learning in Non-writing Communities: The Case of Construction Workers
Management Learning, March 1, 2006; 37(1): 83 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
V. J. Friedman, R. Lipshitz, and M. Popper
The Mystification of Organizational Learning
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2005; 14(1): 19 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]