Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fortado, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Metamorphosis of Workplace Conflict

Bruce Fortado

University of North Florida, bfortado{at}unf.edu

The indirect and informal ways subordinates use to ‘get even’ are explored based on a literature review and fieldwork. The multiple causal factors at work and the interactive nature of these scenarios make chaos theory applicable. The metaphor of ‘metamorphosis’ is used to describe how unresolved conflicts twist and change form over time. Five case examples from the USA are included as illustrations. The transformations conflicts undergo are categorized into four forms: namely, the restatement of an issue, pressure tactics, acts of retribution and compensatory acts. The tactics and meanings that are commonly associated with each category are described. Previously, conflicts have been framed narrowly in short-term, individualistic, rational and substantive terms. Much can be learned by viewing these situations in long-term, social, interactive, emotional and symbolic terms. Elements of subordinate subcultures often come into conflict with the dominant organization culture. These clashes produce unique and unpredictable relational shifts. One must strive to accurately interpret these chaotic transformations in the parties’ day-to-day interactions to determine if and when course corrections are necessary.

Key Words: chaos theory • emotions • relationships • subculture • workplace conflict

Human Relations, Vol. 54, No. 9, 1189-1221 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726701549003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
P. Fleming and A. Spicer
'You Can Checkout Anytime, but You Can Never Leave': Spatial Boundaries in a High Commitment Organization
Human Relations, January 1, 2004; 57(1): 75 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]