Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hepburn, A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Teacher Stress and the Management of Accountability

Alexa Hepburn

Nottingham Trent University, alexa.hepburn{at}ntu.ac.uk

Steven D. Brown

Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University, s.d.brown{at}lboro.ac.uk

In this article we explore how teachers can draw upon the language of stress to perform strategically important and often politically sensitive social acts. Our aim will be to show that the description of teaching problems as a matter of ‘stress’ has important social and political implications for teachers. To do this we draw upon interviews with Scottish secondary school teachers; these interviews have been subjected to close textual analysis, informed by some of the basic principles of discursive psychology. The analysis shows teachers flexibly employing stress as a way of managing their own accountability, and of making sense of their institutional roles and relationships. To conclude, we suggest that employing stress as an individualized category not only suppresses its flexibility, but also encourages both teachers and their employers to offer token measures to manage it at a psychological level, rather than engaging in proper debate about the state of the profession.

Key Words: accountability • discursive psychology • power • teacher stress

Human Relations, Vol. 54, No. 6, 691-715 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726701546001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C. Coupland, A. D. Brown, K. Daniels, and M. Humphreys
Saying it with feeling: Analysing speakable emotions
Human Relations, March 1, 2008; 61(3): 327 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
R. Randall, T. Cox, and A. Griffiths
Participants' accounts of a stress management intervention
Human Relations, August 1, 2007; 60(8): 1181 - 1209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. Chandler, J. Barry, and H. Clark
Stressing Academe: The Wear and Tear of the New Public Management
Human Relations, September 1, 2002; 55(9): 1051 - 1069.
[Abstract] [PDF]