Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sillince, J. A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Getting Acceptance that Radically New Working Practices are Required: Institutionalization of Arguments about Change within a Healthcare Organization

John A.A. Sillince

Royal Holloway Management School, j.sillince{at}rhbnc.ac.uk

Gopalakrishnan Harindranath

Royal Holloway School of Management, University of London, g.harindranath{at}rhbnc.ac.uk

Charles E. Harvey

Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, charles.harvey{at}uwe.ac.uk

This article considers data from a hospital that was introducing an experimental new facility onto an existing site, including the process of institutionalization of the argument ‘The new facility requires radically new working practices.’ The data are used to test a proposed integration of Barley and Tolbert’s (1997) model of the psychological mechanisms involved in institutionalization with a political model of how motives vary during the stages of organizational change. There is some empirical support for a congruence between the two models, namely, that psychological encoding matches with political recognition, psychological enactment matches with political transition, and psychological replication and externalization match with political consolidation.

Key Words: argumentation • conflict • institutionalization • organizational change • rhetoric

Human Relations, Vol. 54, No. 11, 1421-1454 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00187267015411002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
K. Cooney
Fields, Organizations, and Agency: Toward a Multilevel Theory of Institutionalization in Action
Administration Society, October 1, 2007; 39(6): 687 - 718.
[Abstract] [PDF]