Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ferlie, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Professionals: Back to the Future?

Louise Fitzgerald

De Montfort University, lfhum{at}dmu.ac.uk

Ewan Ferlie

Imperial College Management School

This article examines empirical evidence on the impact of the introduction of a quasi-market in healthcare in the UK on professionals, especially doctors. Data are drawn from two longitudinal studies occurring between 1990 and 1994, of aspects of the changes to the health system. Data collection involved a range of methods, including observation, interviews, questionnaires and archival material. The findings show that a unilateral analysis of the impact of the quasimarket on professionals is inadequate to understand the situation. The responses of the professionals to change have had a major influence on the outcomes. Professionals have not uniformly lost power, some have gained considerably. Explanations of the variance of impact and the substantial power shifts have to take account of a range of contextual factors. The market has not had a major impact on the technical autonomy of the doctors. Consequential structural changes have produced a new category of professional managers who are actively managing their colleagues' performance.

Key Words: autonomy • doctors • hybrid managers • quasi-market • regulation

Human Relations, Vol. 53, No. 5, 713-739 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0018726700535005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
P. S. Adler, S.-W. Kwon, and C. Heckscher
Perspective--Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative Community
Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 359 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. R. Tagliaventi and E. Mattarelli
The role of networks of practice, value sharing, and operational proximity in knowledge flows between professional groups
Human Relations, March 1, 2006; 59(3): 291 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]