Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li-Ping Tang, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shin-Hsiung Tang, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Does attitude toward money moderate the relationship between intrinsic job satisfaction and voluntary turnover?

Thomas Li-Ping Tang

Middle Tennessee State University, USA

Jwa K. Kim

Middle Tennessee State University, USA

David Shin-Hsiung Tang

First Union Capital Markets Corp., Charlotte, USA

The present study expanded Judge's (1993) study and tested the hypotheses that people's Money Ethic endorsement (Tang, 1992, 1995) would moderate the intrinsic job satisfaction-withdrawal cognitions relationship and the intrinsic job satisfaction-voluntary turnover relationship in a sample of mental health and mental retardation professionals. Results suggested that Money Ethic endorsement was a moderator for both relationships. For employees with high Money Ethic endorsement, their voluntary turnover was high regardless of their intrinsic job satisfaction. Employees with low Money Ethic endorsement and low intrinsic job satisfaction had the lowest voluntary turnover. Thus, in this sample, just a pull (high Money Ethic) is needed to experience turnover. Money Ethic endorsement predicted actual turnover behavior, but withdrawal cognitions did not. Money Ethic endorsement was not a mediator of the intrinsic job satisfaction and turnover relationship. Results are discussed in terms of the small, but growing literature on the psychology of money (Furnham & Argyle, 1998). Future research needs to re-focus on employees' actual turnover behavior, rather than the substitutes or proxies of turnover behavior, such as withdrawal cognitions.

Key Words: job satisfaction • money ethic • turnover • withdrawal cognitions

Human Relations, Vol. 53, No. 2, 213-245 (2000)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
A. E. Mickel and L. A. Barron
Getting "More Bang for the Buck": Symbolic Value of Monetary Rewards in Organizations
Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2008; 17(4): 329 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Human ResourcesHome page
N. M. Fortin
The Gender Wage Gap among Young Adults in the United States: The Importance of Money versus People
J. Human Resources, October 1, 2008; 43(4): 884 - 918.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Family Business ReviewHome page
J. Lee
Impact of Family Relationships on Attitudes of the Second Generation in Family Business
Family Business Review, September 1, 2006; 19(3): 175 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
S. C. Selden and D. P. Moynihan
A Model of Voluntary Turnover in State Government
Review of Public Personnel Administration, April 1, 2000; 20(2): 63 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]