|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Organizational Symbolism as a Social Construction: A Perspective from the Sociology of Knowledge
Antonio Strati
Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, UniversitA degli Studi di Trento, Trento, Italy; Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, Universita degli Studi di Trento, via G. Verdi 26, 1-38100 Trento, Italy antonio.strati{at}soc.unitn.it
This article describes organizational symbolism from a sociology of knowledge perspective and considers both the theoretical and extra-theoretical bases of the symbolic approach. It illustrates the distinctive principles of the symbolic approach with respect to other methods used in the study of organizations, the concepts on which it is based, and the organizational issues on which it has shed significant light. Symbolist studies of organizations have refocused scholarly attention on the multidisciplinary understanding of the logos, ethos, and pathos of organizational life. They have done so by stressing the production of knowledge tout court, rather than concerning themselves with the applicability of the organizational knowledge acquired by this approach for managerial purposes. Organizational symbolism is described in the article as a fluctuating and emerging social construction whose growth and spread has been fostered by support within academia.
Key Words: organizational symbolism organization cultures qualitative analysis of organizations social construction of reality and constructionism sociology of knowledge
Human Relations, Vol. 51, No. 11,
1379-1402 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679805101103

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Flores-Pereira, E. Davel, and N. R. Cavedon
Drinking beer and understanding organizational culture embodiment
Human Relations,
July 1, 2008;
61(7):
1007 - 1026.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Ewenstein and J. Whyte
Beyond Words: Aesthetic Knowledge and Knowing in Organizations
Organization Studies,
May 1, 2007;
28(5):
689 - 708.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rafaeli and I. Vilnai-Yavetz
Emotion as a Connection of Physical Artifacts and Organizations
Organization Science,
November 1, 2004;
15(6):
671 - 686.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Cairns
Aesthetics, Morality and Power: Design as Espoused Freedom and Implicit Control
Human Relations,
July 1, 2002;
55(7):
799 - 820.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Y. Martin
Sensations, Bodies, and the 'Spirit of a Place': Aesthetics in Residential Organizations for the Elderly
Human Relations,
July 1, 2002;
55(7):
861 - 885.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Prasad and R. Mir
Digging Deep for Meaning: A Critical Hermeneutic Analysis of CEO Letters to Shareholders in the Oil Industry
Journal of Business Communication,
January 1, 2002;
39(1):
92 - 116.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gberardi
Where Learning is: Metaphors and Situated Learning in a Planning Group
Human Relations,
August 1, 2000;
53(8):
1057 - 1080.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|