Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strati, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Organizational Symbolism as a Social Construction: A Perspective from the Sociology of Knowledge

Antonio Strati

Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, UniversitA degli Studi di Trento, Trento, Italy; Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, Universita degli Studi di Trento, via G. Verdi 26, 1-38100 Trento, Italy antonio.strati{at}soc.unitn.it

This article describes organizational symbolism from a sociology of knowledge perspective and considers both the theoretical and extra-theoretical bases of the symbolic approach. It illustrates the distinctive principles of the symbolic approach with respect to other methods used in the study of organizations, the concepts on which it is based, and the organizational issues on which it has shed significant light. Symbolist studies of organizations have refocused scholarly attention on the multidisciplinary understanding of the logos, ethos, and pathos of organizational life. They have done so by stressing the production of knowledge tout court, rather than concerning themselves with the applicability of the organizational knowledge acquired by this approach for managerial purposes. Organizational symbolism is described in the article as a fluctuating and emerging social construction whose growth and spread has been fostered by support within academia.

Key Words: organizational symbolism • organization cultures • qualitative analysis of organizations • social construction of reality and constructionism • sociology of knowledge

Human Relations, Vol. 51, No. 11, 1379-1402 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679805101103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. T. Flores-Pereira, E. Davel, and N. R. Cavedon
Drinking beer and understanding organizational culture embodiment
Human Relations, July 1, 2008; 61(7): 1007 - 1026.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
B. Ewenstein and J. Whyte
Beyond Words: Aesthetic Knowledge and Knowing in Organizations
Organization Studies, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 689 - 708.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Rafaeli and I. Vilnai-Yavetz
Emotion as a Connection of Physical Artifacts and Organizations
Organization Science, November 1, 2004; 15(6): 671 - 686.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
G. Cairns
Aesthetics, Morality and Power: Design as Espoused Freedom and Implicit Control
Human Relations, July 1, 2002; 55(7): 799 - 820.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
P. Y. Martin
Sensations, Bodies, and the 'Spirit of a Place': Aesthetics in Residential Organizations for the Elderly
Human Relations, July 1, 2002; 55(7): 861 - 885.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
A. Prasad and R. Mir
Digging Deep for Meaning: A Critical Hermeneutic Analysis of CEO Letters to Shareholders in the Oil Industry
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2002; 39(1): 92 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S. Gberardi
Where Learning is: Metaphors and Situated Learning in a Planning Group
Human Relations, August 1, 2000; 53(8): 1057 - 1080.
[Abstract] [PDF]