|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Family-Responsive Variables and Retention-Relevant Outcomes Among Employed Parents
Samuel Aryee
Department of Management, School of Business, Hong Kong Baptist University, 224 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Vivienne Luk
Raymond Stone
Department of Management, School of Business, Hong Kong Bapitist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
This study examined the influence of family-responsive variables and the moderating influence of gender on the retention-relevant outcomes of organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Data were obtained with the aid of structured questionnaires from employed parents (N = 228) in a human service authority in Hong Kong. Results of regression analysis revealed that satisfaction with work schedule flexibility and supervisor work-family support were related to both retention-relevant outcomes. Contrary to our prediction, gender did not moderate the influence of any of the family-responsive variables on the retention-relevant outcomes. Limitations of the study, directions for future research and implications of the findings for enhancing the effectiveness of family-responsive human resource policies are discussed.
Key Words: family-responsive variables employed parents retention-relevant outcomes
Human Relations, Vol. 51, No. 1,
73-87 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679805100105

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Haley-Lock and J. Kruzich
Serving Workers in the Human Services: The Roles of Organizational Ownership, Chain Affiliation, and Professional Leadership in Frontline Job Benefits
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
September 1, 2008;
37(3):
443 - 467.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Noonan, S. B. Estes, and J. L. Glass
Do Workplace Flexibility Policies Influence Time Spent in Domestic Labor?
Journal of Family Issues,
February 1, 2007;
28(2):
263 - 288.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Foley, F. Linnehan, J. H. Greenhaus, and C. H. Weer
The Impact of Gender Similarity, Racial Similarity, and Work Culture on Family-Supportive Supervision
Group Organization Management,
August 1, 2006;
31(4):
420 - 441.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Davis and A. L. Kalleberg
Family-Friendly Organizations? Work and Family Programs in the 1990s
Work and Occupations,
May 1, 2006;
33(2):
191 - 223.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Liddicoat
Stakeholder Perceptions of Family-Friendly Workplaces: An Examination of Six New Zealand Organisations
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,
December 1, 2003;
41(3):
354 - 370.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Boxall, K. Macky, and E. Rasmussen
Labour Turnover and Retention in New Zealand: The Causes and Consequences of Leaving and Staying with Employers
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,
August 1, 2003;
41(2):
196 - 214.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. WHARTON and M. BLAIR-LOY
The "Overtime Culture" in a Global Corporation: A Cross-national Study of Finance Professionals' Interest in Working Part-time
Work and Occupations,
February 1, 2002;
29(1):
32 - 63.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Lewis and J. Smithson
Sense of Entitlement to Support for the Reconciliation of Employment and Family Life
Human Relations,
November 1, 2001;
54(11):
1455 - 1481.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Aryee, D. Fields, and V. Luk
A Cross-Cultural Test of a Model of the Work-Family Interface
Journal of Management,
August 1, 1999;
25(4):
491 - 511.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|