This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Harley, S. Articles by Lee, F. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Research Selectivity, Managerialism, and the Academic Labor Process: The Future of Nonmainstream Economics in U.K. Universities

School of Business, Department of Public Policy and Managerial Studies, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, U.K.

Frederic S. Lee

School of Business, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, U.K.

This paper reports the results of empirical research designed to explore the impact of research selectivity on the work and employment of academic economists in U.K. universities. Research selectivity is seen as part of the general trend toward "managerialism" in higher education in both the U.K. and abroad. Managerialism based on performance indicators and hierarchical control has been contrasted with collegiate control-based or informal peer review. However, analysis of the academic labor process has idealized collegiate relations at the expense of professional hierarchies and intellectual authority relations. We argue that in the U.K., there has evolved a mainstream economics which is located within a well-defined neoclassical core. We find that the existence of lists of core mainstream journals which are believed to count most in the periodic ranking exercise poses a serious threat to academic freedom and diversity within the profession, institutionalizing the control which representatives of the mainstream exercise over both the academic labor process and job market. In this way, managerialism combines with peer review to outflank resistance to new forms of controlling academic labor at the same time as reinforcing disciplinary boundaries through centralized systems of bureaucratic standardization and control.

Key Words: managerialism • academic • labor process • economics

Human Relations, Vol. 50, No. 11, 1427-1460 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679705001105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Symon, A. Buehring, P. Johnson, and C. Cassell Positioning Qualitative Research as Resistance to the Institutionalization of the Academic Labour Process Organization Studies, October 1, 2008; 29(10): 1315 - 1336. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Macdonald and J. Kam Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies Journal of Information Science, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 702 - 717. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. S. Lee The Research Assessment Exercise, the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities Camb. J. Econ., March 1, 2007; 31(2): 309 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Keenoy Facing Inwards and Outwards at Once: The liminal temporalities of academic perfomativity Time Society, September 1, 2005; 14(2-3): 303 - 321. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Glaser Why are the Most Influential Books in Australian Sociology not Necessarily the Most Highly Cited Ones? Journal of Sociology, September 1, 2004; 40(3): 261 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Holman Contemporary Models of Management Education in the UK Management Learning, June 1, 2000; 31(2): 197 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF]