Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brewis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Linstead, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Unpacking Priscilla: Subjectivity and Identity in the Organization of Gendered Appearance

Joanna Brewis

Department of Business & Management, Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth, Locksway Road, Milton, Southsea, Hants P04 8JF, U.K.

Mark P. Hampton

Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth, Milton, Southsea, Hants P04 8JF, U.K.

Stephen Linstead

Department of Management, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, New South Wales 2522, Australia.

This paper argues that our understandings of ourselves as gendered, as either masculine or feminine, are a power effect of the contemporary discourse of gender difference. The main premise of the paper is that this social construction of gender allows for gender difference to be resisted-and the form of resistance analyzed here is gender-inappropriate dress. Two forms of gender-inappropriate dress-male transvestism and female power dressing-are discussed in the paper and argued to present a particular kind of challenge to our discursively constituted sense of the rigidity and mutual exclusivity of the gender divide. This analysis is used in the conclusion to offer some critical comments regarding the strand of organizational analysis which argues for a "feminization/reeroticization" of the workplace.

Key Words: gender • discourse • transgression • dress • transvestism • power dressing

Human Relations, Vol. 50, No. 10, 1275-1304 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679705001005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S. Linstead and A. Pullen
Gender as multiplicity: Desire, displacement, difference and dispersion
Human Relations, September 1, 2006; 59(9): 1287 - 1310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
L. Cohen and M. Tyler
The Office (27 November 2003-18 January 2004), the Photographers' Gallery, London: A Review
Work Employment Society, September 1, 2004; 18(3): 621 - 629.
[PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
S. Linstead
Organizational Kitsch
Organization, November 1, 2002; 9(4): 657 - 682.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
A. Trethewey
Reproducing and Resisting the Master Narrative of Decline: Midlife Professional Women's Experiences of Aging
Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 2001; 15(2): 183 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Sinclair
Teaching Managers about Masculinities: Are You Kidding?
Management Learning, March 1, 2000; 31(1): 83 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. Brewis
Book Reviews
Work Employment Society, December 1, 1998; 12(4): 790 - 792.
[PDF]