Human Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (48)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicolini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Meznar, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human Relations, Vol. 48, No. 7, 727-746 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679504800701

The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the Field

Davide Nicolini

Organizational Consultant, Florence, Italy.

Martin B. Meznar

Arizona State University West, Phoenix, Arizona 85069-7100.

The field of organizational learning (OL) has been characterized by a wide diversity of opinions, definitions, and conceptualizations. After discussing difficulties associated with previous conceptualizations of organizational learning, this paper suggests a broader conceptualization which is consistent with and integrates diverse perspectives in the field of OL. To the extent that organizations continuously act and enact their environments, cognitive processes associated with learning continually take place whether the organization recognizes it or not. OL cannot be understood without taking into account the continuous ongoing change of organizational cognitive structures. However, learning is only recognized when an observer identifies and contextualizes those changes. Thus, organizational learning can be interpreted as a social construction which transforms acquired cognition into accountable abstract knowledge. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of this conceptualization of learning on management practice and organizational research.

Key Words: organizational learning • social construction • cognition • cognitive structures


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
N. Heraty and M. Morley
Dimensionalizing the Architecture of Organization-Led Learning: A Framework for Collective Practice
Advances in Developing Human Resources, August 1, 2008; 10(4): 472 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Rowe
Unfolding the Dance of Team Learning: A Metaphorical Investigation of Collective Learning
Management Learning, February 1, 2008; 39(1): 41 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
O. Belkhodja, N. Amara, R. Landry, and M. Ouimet
The Extent and Organizational Determinants of Research Utilization in Canadian Health Services Organizations
Science Communication, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 377 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
I. M. Prieto and E. Revilla
Assessing the Impact of Learning Capability on Business Performance: Empirical Evidence from Spain
Management Learning, December 1, 2006; 37(4): 499 - 522.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. R. Tagliaventi and E. Mattarelli
The role of networks of practice, value sharing, and operational proximity in knowledge flows between professional groups
Human Relations, March 1, 2006; 59(3): 291 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
P. T. Burgi, C. D. Jacobs, and J. Roos
From Metaphor to Practice: In the Crafting of Strategy
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2005; 14(1): 78 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C. Jacobs and D. Coghlan
Sound from silence: On listening in organizational learning
Human Relations, January 1, 2005; 58(1): 115 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
H. Bapuji and M. Crossan
From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organizational Learning Research
Management Learning, December 1, 2004; 35(4): 397 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
B. Elkjaer
Organizational Learning: The 'Third Way'
Management Learning, December 1, 2004; 35(4): 419 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
J. Cope
Entrepreneurial Learning and Critical Reflection: Discontinuous Events as Triggers for 'Higher-level' Learning
Management Learning, December 1, 2003; 34(4): 429 - 450.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
H. Berends, K. Boersma, and M. Weggeman
The Structuration of Organizational Learning
Human Relations, September 1, 2003; 56(9): 1035 - 1056.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
A. E. Akgun, G. S. Lynn, and J. C. Byrne
Organizational Learning: A Socio-Cognitive Framework
Human Relations, July 1, 2003; 56(7): 839 - 868.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
D. R. Gnyawali and A. C. Stewart
A Contingency Perspective on Organizational Learning: Integrating Environmental Context, Organizational Learning Processes, and Types of Learning
Management Learning, March 1, 2003; 34(1): 63 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
S. Gherardi
Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations
Organization, May 1, 2000; 7(2): 211 - 223.
[PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. Contu and H. Willmott
Comment on Wenger and Yanow. Knowing in Practice: A `Delicate Flower' in the Organizational Learning Field
Organization, May 1, 2000; 7(2): 269 - 276.
[PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
S. Gherardi and D. Nicolini
To Transfer is to Transform: The Circulation of Safety Knowledge
Organization, May 1, 2000; 7(2): 329 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
M. Easterby-Smith, R. Snell, and S. Gherardi
Organizational Learning: Diverging Communities of Practice?
Management Learning, September 1, 1998; 29(3): 259 - 272.
[Abstract]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
S. Gherardi, D. Nicolini, and F. Odella
Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations: The Notion of Situated Curriculum
Management Learning, September 1, 1998; 29(3): 273 - 297.
[Abstract]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
I. Richter
Individual and Organizational Learning at the Executive Level: Towards a Research Agenda
Management Learning, September 1, 1998; 29(3): 299 - 316.
[Abstract]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Easterby-Smith
Disciplines of Organizational Learning: Contributions and Critiques
Human Relations, September 1, 1997; 50(9): 1085 - 1113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
E. W. K. Tsang
Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: A Dichotomy Between Descriptive and Prescriptive Research
Human Relations, January 1, 1997; 50(1): 73 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]