Human Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welbournel, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cable, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human Relations, Vol. 48, No. 6, 711-726 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679504800606

Group Incentives and Pay Satisfaction: Understanding the Relationship Through an Identity Theory Perspective

Theresa M. Welbournel

Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, 393 Ives Hall, Ithaca, New York 14851-0952.

Daniel M. Cable

School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, 393 Ives Hall, Ithaca, New York 14851-0952.

The goal of this paper is to develop a conceptual model based on identity theory to specify the relationship between group incentives and pay satisfaction. Pay satisfaction, as currently measured, does not include items that directly measure group-based rewards, therefore, any changes in pay satisfaction associated with group incentive implementation would be the result of some spillover effect. Identity theory is employed to model this effect by delineating how group incentives tap salient work-related roles; the theory also has implications for various behavioral consequences. The research described in this paper tests two hypotheses derived from the conceptual model. These hypotheses are tested in two quasi-experimental field studies conducted in a high technology firm and a consumer products company that both implemented gainsharing programs. The findings indicate that gainsharing plans can be viewed as either a benefit or as part of individual pay based on the ability of the incentive plan to activate salient work-related roles.

Key Words: group incentives • gainsharing • identity theory • field study


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. P. Guthrie and E. C. Hollensbe
Group Incentives and Performance: A Study of Spontaneous Goal Setting, Goal Choice and Commitment
Journal of Management, April 1, 2004; 30(2): 263 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
T. M. Welbourne
Untangling Procedural and Distributive Justice: Their Relative Effects on Gainsharing Satisfaction
Group Organization Management, December 1, 1998; 23(4): 325 - 346.
[Abstract]