Human Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrisonl, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human Relations, Vol. 47, No. 10, 1201-1231 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679404701003

Professional Control as Process: Beyond Structural Theories

Michael I. Harrisonl

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Bar Ilan University, 52900 Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Until recently, studies of the impact of bureaucratic employment on professionals drew heavily on structural models, such as the theories of proletarianization and of professional stratification. In contrast, this paper develops a processual approach to professional control. This approach views control as resulting from struggles by occupational groups for institutional recognition and from struggles and negotiations within and between occupations. The structural and processual approaches are applied to the explanation of union activity-an increasingly prominent form of collective action among employed professionals. Unionization and union militancy are examined among Israeli physicians, who have a long history of bureaucratic employment. Although they are helpful, neither the proletarianization nor the stratification theories adequately account for the overall pattern of medical unionization or for individual and subgroup involvement in a lengthy physicians' strike. The processual approach points to several forces that help explain unionization and variations in strike involvement. These forces include institutional and contextual conditions, power differences between professional-subgroups, interactions among multiple actors in and around the professions, and the professionals' subjective interpretations and feelings. Although the processual approach is a loose perspective, rather than a tight-knit theory, it offers a better guide than the structural theories to investigating both professional-bureaucratic relations and collective actions aimed at enhancing professional control.

Key Words: professionals • unionization • proletarianization • occupational • control


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
K. Real and L. L. Putnam
Ironies in the Discursive Struggle of Pilots Defending the Profession
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2005; 19(1): 91 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
L. Cohen, J. Duberley, and J. McAuley
Fueling Discovery or Monitoring Productivity: Research Scientists' Changing Perceptions of Management
Organization, August 1, 1999; 6(3): 473 - 497.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
L. Cohen and M. Mallon
The Transition from Organisational Employment to Portfolio Working: Perceptions of `Boundarylessness'
Work Employment Society, June 1, 1999; 13(2): 329 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
D. Chinitz
Israel's Health Policy Breakthrough: The Politics of Reform and the Reform of Politics
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1995; 20(4): 909 - 932.
[Abstract] [PDF]