|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Chaos Theory and Its Implications for Social Science Research
Hal Gregersen
Marriott School of Management, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602. 22400 B Woodchase Lane, Marietta, Georgia 30067.
Lee Sailer
22400 B Woodchase Lane, Marietta, Georgia 30067.
Based on theoretical and mathematical principles of chaos theory, we argue that the customary social science goals of "prediction" and "control" of systems behavior are sometimes, if not usually, unobtainable. Specifically, chaos theory shows how it is possible for nearly identical entities embedded in identical environments to exhibit radically different behaviors, even when the underlying systems are extremely simple and completely deterministic. Furthermore, chaos theory arguments are general enough to apply to any type of entity, including individuals, groups, and organizations, and therefore they are relevant to a large domain of social science problems. As a result, this paper concludes with six familiar claims about the study of social phenomena for which chaos theory provides new theoretical arguments.
Key Words: chaos theory • dynamic social systems
Human Relations, Vol. 46, No. 7,
777-802 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679304600701
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
E. Antonacopoulou and R. Chiva
The Social Complexity of Organizational Learning: The Dynamics of Learning and Organizing
Management Learning,
July 1, 2007;
38(3):
277 - 295.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Dorado
Institutional Entrepreneurship, Partaking, and Convening
Organization Studies,
March 1, 2005;
26(3):
385 - 414.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Bolstorff
Supply Chain: A Framework for Expanding the Human Resource Development Professional's Role in Technology Implementations
Advances in Developing Human Resources,
November 1, 2002;
4(4):
533 - 549.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. L. Diaz, R. D. Drumm, J. Ramirez-Johnson, and H. Oidjarv
Social capital, economic development and food security in Peru's mountain region
International Social Work,
July 1, 2002;
45(4):
481 - 495.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Fortado
The Metamorphosis of Workplace Conflict
Human Relations,
September 1, 2001;
54(9):
1189 - 1221.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Reeves, W. J. Duncan, and P. M. Ginter
Leading Change by Managing Paradoxes
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies,
January 1, 2000;
7(1):
13 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Aycan
Cross-Cultural Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Contributions, Past Developments, and Future Directions
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
January 1, 2000;
31(1):
110 - 128.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Houston
Self-Organizing Systems Theory: Historical Challenges to New Sciences
Management Communication Quarterly,
August 1, 1999;
13(1):
119 - 134.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. D. Walters
Crime and Chaos: Applying Nonlinear Dynamic Principles to Problems in Criminology
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol,
June 1, 1999;
43(2):
134 - 153.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Mathews, M. C. White, and R. G. Long
The Problem of Prediction and Control in Theoretical Diversity and the Promise of the Complexity Sciences
Journal of Management Inquiry,
March 1, 1999;
8(1):
17 - 31.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Tsoukas
Introduction: Chaos, Complexity and Organization Theory
Organization,
August 1, 1998;
5(3):
291 - 313.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Black and H. B. Gregersen
Participative Decision-Making: An Integration of Multiple Dimensions
Human Relations,
July 1, 1997;
50(7):
859 - 878.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ayers
The Application of Chaos Theory to Psychology
Theory Psychology,
June 1, 1997;
7(3):
373 - 398.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
