Human Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cordery, J.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human Relations, Vol. 46, No. 6, 705-723 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679304600602

Correlates of Employee Attitudes Toward Functional Flexibility

John Cordery

Department of Management, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia 6009.

Peter Sevastos

Wally Mueller

School of Psychology, Curtin University of Technology, PO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6001.

Sharon Parker

MRC/ESRC Social and Applied Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield SlO 2TN, United Kingdom.

Public service employees (3044) completed a questionnaire seeking information on their expectations regarding a proposal to increase their functional flexibility. It was proposed that beliefs concerning the unfavorability of outcomes of the intervention would be correlated with a range of biographical, affective, and job content variables. Multivariate analyses revealed that the scope of an employees' existing job and biographical variables (apart from age) were not generally predictive of attitudes to functional flexibility. Rather, unfavorable attitudes were weakly associated with low levels of extrinsic satisfaction, perceived reward equity, aspiration organizational commitment, and age. The implications of these findings for work and skills restructuring interventions and organizational change in general are discussed.

Key Words: functional flexibility • job design • work attitudes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
I. Beltran-Martin, V. Roca-Puig, A. Escrig-Tena, and J. C. Bou-Llusar
Human Resource Flexibility as a Mediating Variable Between High Performance Work Systems and Performance
Journal of Management, October 1, 2008; 34(5): 1009 - 1044.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
D. P. Lepak, R. Takeuchi, and S. A. Snell
Employment Flexibility and Firm Performance: Examining the Interaction Effects of Employment Mode, Environmental Dynamism, and Technological Intensity
Journal of Management, October 1, 2003; 29(5): 681 - 703.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
Z. Rosenblatt
Teachers' Multiple Roles and Skill Flexibility: Effects on Work Attitudes
Educational Administration Quarterly, December 1, 2001; 37(5): 684 - 708.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
C. S. Koberg, R. W. Boss, J. C. Senjem, and E. A. Goodman
Antecedents and Outcomes of Empowerment: Empirical Evidence from the Health Care Industry
Group Organization Management, March 1, 1999; 24(1): 71 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
R. C. Liden, D. Stilwell, and G. R. Ferris
The Effects of Supervisor and Subordinate Age on Objective Performance and Subjective Performance Ratings
Human Relations, March 1, 1996; 49(3): 327 - 347.
[Abstract] [PDF]