Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (76)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elden, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to the Special Issue

Max Elden

University of Houston Clear Lake, School of Business & Public Administration, Houston, Texas 77058.

Rupert F. Chisholm

Center for Quality of Working Life, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

Action research is defined and its scientific basis is noted but not argued. Although its original, classical form established almost a half century ago still exists, there has recently emerged a variety of new models for doing action research today. The basic classical model is described in terms of five elements. These are, in turn, used to introduce the present collection of reports on new, emergent varieties of contemporary action research that complement and extend the classic model. The reports come from projects in hundreds of organizations, in communities and regions, and in numerous countries. The ideas behind the basic model of action research may remain viable today only because they are being practiced in new ways, in innovative research designs, and applied to new problems. The collection of cases presented in this special issue illustrates the rich variety of new thinking available in contemporary action research.

Key Words: participation • action research • organization design • participatory research

Human Relations, Vol. 46, No. 2, 121-142 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679304600201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EvaluationHome page
J. C. Suarez-Herrera, J. Springett, and C. Kagan
Critical Connections between Participatory Evaluation, Organizational Learning and Intentional Change in Pluralistic Organizations
Evaluation, July 1, 2009; 15(3): 321 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
S. Benn and D. Dunphy
Action Research as an Approach to Integrating Sustainability Into MBA Programs: An Exploratory Study
Journal of Management Education, June 1, 2009; 33(3): 276 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. Bargal
Action Research: A Paradigm for Achieving Social Change
Small Group Research, February 1, 2008; 39(1): 17 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Action ResearchHome page
J. S. Drummond and M. Themessl-Huber
The cyclical process of action research: The contribution of Gilles Deleuze
Action Research, December 1, 2007; 5(4): 430 - 448.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
C. Pope
Review: Exploring the effectiveness of action research as a tool for organizational change in health care
Journal of Research in Nursing, July 1, 2007; 12(4): 401 - 402.
[PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C. Cassell and P. Johnson
Action research: Explaining the diversity
Human Relations, June 1, 2006; 59(6): 783 - 814.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
D. Coghlan
Practitioner Research for Organizational Knowledge: Mechanistic- and Organistic-Oriented Approaches to Insider Action Research
Management Learning, December 1, 2003; 34(4): 451 - 463.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
D. M. Kramer and D. C. Cole
Sustained, Intensive Engagement to Promote Health and Safety Knowledge Transfer to and Utilization by Workplaces
Science Communication, September 1, 2003; 25(1): 56 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
F. Heller
Reviews Section
Management Learning, September 1, 2003; 34(3): 386 - 389.
[PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
C. Huxham and S. Vangen
Researching Organizational Practice through Action Research: Case Studies and Design Choices
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2003; 6(3): 383 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
V. J. Marsick
Extended Review
Management Learning, December 1, 2002; 33(4): 519 - 525.
[PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. Bargal
Book Review: Improving Intergroup Relations
Small Group Research, August 1, 2002; 33(4): 466 - 471.
[PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
B. Morrison and R. Lilford
How can Action Research Apply to Health Services?
Qual Health Res, July 1, 2001; 11(4): 436 - 449.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
K. Rasanen and H. Mantyla
Preserving Academic Diversity: Promises and Uncertainties of PAR as a Survival Strategy
Organization, May 1, 2001; 8(2): 299 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
G. Johnson
Strategy through a Cultural Lens: Learning from Managers' Experience
Management Learning, December 1, 2000; 31(4): 403 - 426.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
J. Raelin
Preface
Management Learning, June 1, 1999; 30(2): 115 - 125.
[PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
L. Dickens and K. Watkins
Action Research: Rethinking Lewin
Management Learning, June 1, 1999; 30(2): 127 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. K. Heiman
Science by the People: Grassroots Environmental Monitoring and the Debate Over Scientific Expertise
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 1997; 16(4): 291 - 299.



Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
R. F. Chisholm
On the Meaning of Networks
Group Organization Management, June 1, 1996; 21(2): 216 - 235.
[Abstract]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C. Hendry
Understanding and Creating Whole Organizational Change Through Learning Theory
Human Relations, May 1, 1996; 49(5): 621 - 641.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
G. R. Bushe and G. Coetzer
Appreciative Inquiry as a Team-Development Intervention: A Controlled Experiment
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 1995; 31(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
R. Vince
Emphasizing Learning in Management Research
Management Learning, March 1, 1995; 26(1): 55 - 72.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
H. Aguinis
Action Research and Scientific Method: Presumed Discrepancies and Actual Similarities
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1993; 29(4): 416 - 431.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. M. Bartunekl
Scholarly Dialogues and Participatory Action Research
Human Relations, October 1, 1993; 46(10): 1221 - 1233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
F. Heller
Another Look at Action Research
Human Relations, October 1, 1993; 46(10): 1235 - 1242.
[PDF]