|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
From Postmodern Anthropology to Deconstructive Ethnography
Stephen Linstead
Department of Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clearwater Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
The social sciences have recently exhibited renewed interest in ethnography while traditional anthropology has been struggling with the challenges of postmodernism. This paper considers the theoretical implications of the potential convergence of these strands, with particular reference to the ethnography of organizations. Postmodernism is seen to affect ethnography by problematizing the processes of description, reference, and the establishment of authority in ethnographic texts. It offers, rather than a "scientific" model, a "literary" model of such texts in which description is an active construction rather than a neutral recording of the other's world. Ostensive reference becomes displaced by evocation, the single authorial voice by the "heteroglossia" of many contributing voices. Unfortunately, there is a tendency for the processes of interpretation to be abandoned to a free play of unlimited signification in which any and all meanings are possible, which jettisons rigor and with it critical acerbity. This paper argues for the development of deconstructive ethnography grounded in the work of Jacques Derrida. This ethnographic praxis would demystify social and organizational actions by revealing their inevitable and ever-present internal contradictions without resorting to an externally contrived theoretical or moral standard. It would realize its emancipatory potential through "self-deconstruction."
Key Words: ethnography • deconstruction • postmodernism • social investigation
Human Relations, Vol. 46, No. 1,
97-120 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679304600107
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. Learmonth
The Violence in Trusting Trust Chief Executives: Glimpsing Trust in the U.K. National Health Service
Qualitative Inquiry,
August 1, 2004;
10(4):
581 - 600.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. B. Banerjee and S. Linstead
Masking Subversion: Neocolonial Embeddedness in Anthropological Accounts of Indigenous Management
Human Relations,
February 1, 2004;
57(2):
221 - 247.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. L. Cunliffe
Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities
Human Relations,
August 1, 2003;
56(8):
983 - 1003.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Gherardi and D. Nicolini
Learning the Trade: A Culture of Safety in Practice
Organization,
May 1, 2002;
9(2):
191 - 223.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Hatch
The Role of the Researcher: An Analysis of Narrative Position in Organization Theory
Journal of Management Inquiry,
December 1, 1996;
5(4):
359 - 374.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. R. BLYLER
Narrative and Research in Professional Communication
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
July 1, 1996;
10(3):
330 - 351.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Spink
Book Review: Work Motivation-Models for Developing Countries
Human Relations,
April 1, 1996;
49(4):
501 - 522.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Alvesson
The Meaning and Meaninglessness of Postmodernism: Some Ironic Remarks
Organization Studies,
January 1, 1995;
16(6):
1047 - 1075.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. M. Lee and S. E. Ackerman
Fare well to Ethnography?: Global embourgeoisement and the disprivileging of the narrative
Critique of Anthropology,
December 1, 1994;
14(4):
339 - 354.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Linsteadl
Objectivity, Reflexivity, and Fiction: Humanity, Inhumanity, and the Science of the Social
Human Relations,
November 1, 1994;
47(11):
1321 - 1346.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
