Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Language, Technology, Gender, and Power

Fiona Wilson

Department of Management, University of St. Andrews, Kennedy Gardens, St. Andrews, Fife KY169DJ, Scotland.

This paper stems from a concern with how women are linguistically excluded in organizations. The paper will focus mainly on the form of language associated with technical change. Using research data the paper explores how metaphors are used within organizations which are in the process of adopting new technical systems, and what their use achieves. It is argued that men seek, knowingly or unknowingly, to facilitate the technological change process by drawing upon linguistic resources which reproduce relations of power. These resources are constituted as discourses of "battle," "maleness," and of "religious evangelism," expressed through metaphor. The language also serves the function of providing a vehicle for change; it marks out the "rules" as to how change is to be achieved; it not only helps differentiate "saints" from the "sinners" but helps re-enforce the power and all-encompassing dominance of male ideology in organizations. Language creates a reality which is gender-biased.

Key Words: language • technology • gender • power

Human Relations, Vol. 45, No. 9, 883-904 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679204500902


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
V. Koller
Critical discourse analysis and social cognition: evidence from business media discourse
Discourse Society, March 1, 2005; 16(2): 199 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
E. Vaara, J. Tienari, and R. Santti
The International Match: Metaphors as Vehicles of Social Identity-Building in Cross-Border Mergers
Human Relations, April 1, 2003; 56(4): 419 - 451.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
K. Kamoche
Developing Managers: The Functional, the Symbolic, the Sacred and the Profane
Organization Studies, July 1, 2000; 21(4): 747 - 774.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
C. Carroll
Rearticulating Organizational Identity: Exploring Corporate Images and Employee Identification
Management Learning, December 1, 1995; 26(4): 463 - 482.
[Abstract]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
K. Kamoche
Rhetoric, Ritualism, and Totemism in Human Resource Management
Human Relations, April 1, 1995; 48(4): 367 - 385.
[Abstract] [PDF]