Human Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashforth, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human Relations, Vol. 43, No. 7, 621-648 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679004300702

Defensive Behavior in Organizations: A Preliminary Model

Blake E. Ashforth

Concordia University

Raymond T. Lee

Wayne State University

The literature on organizational politics has focused on the proactive promotion of self-interests but has neglected the reactive defense of self-interests. Defensive behaviors are argued to: (1) avoid action, via over-conforming, passing the buck, playing dumb, depersonalizing, smoothing and stretching, and stalling, (2) avoid blame via buffing, playing safe, justifying, scapegoating, misrepresenting, and escalating commitment, and (3) avoid change via resisting change and protecting turf. Organizational antecedents of defensiveness include bureaucratic rationality and various stressors, and individual antecedents include insecurity and anxiety, emotional exhaustion, work alienation, self-monitoring, and low self-efficacy. The effects of defensiveness on the individual, recipients, and organization are discussed, and directions for future research are presented.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Organization ManagementHome page
B. E. Ashforth, C. T. Kulik, and M. A. Tomiuk
How Service Agents Manage the Person Role Interface
Group Organization Management, February 1, 2008; 33(1): 5 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
N. J. Johnson and T. Klee
Passive-Aggressive Behavior and Leadership Styles in Organizations
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, November 1, 2007; 14(2): 130 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
J. A. Clair and R. L. Dufresne
Playing the grim reaper: How employees experience carrying out a downsizing
Human Relations, December 1, 2004; 57(12): 1597 - 1625.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization ScienceHome page
S. Maitlis and H. Ozcelik
Toxic Decision Processes: A Study of Emotion and Organizational Decision Making
Organization Science, July 1, 2004; 15(4): 375 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
S. E. Moss, E. R. Valenzi, and W. Taggart
Are You Hiding from Your Boss? The Development of a Taxonomy and Instrument to Assess the Feedback Management Behaviors of Good and Bad Performers
Journal of Management, August 1, 2003; 29(4): 487 - 510.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management LearningHome page
H. K. Thomsen and V. Hoest
Employees' Perception of the Learning Organization
Management Learning, December 1, 2001; 32(4): 469 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Organization ManagementHome page
L. A. Witt, T. F. Hilton, and W. A. Hochwarter
Addressing Politics in Matrix Teams
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2001; 26(2): 230 - 247.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
S. H. Cady and P. M. Fandt
Managing Impressions with Information: A Field Study of Organizational Realities
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 2001; 37(2): 180 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Management EducationHome page
A. M. Mazen
Like Water for Chocolate: Action Theory for the OB Class
Journal of Management Education, June 1, 2000; 24(3): 304 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
M. K. Duffy and J. D. Shaw
The Salieri Syndrome: Consequences of Envy in Groups
Small Group Research, February 1, 2000; 31(1): 3 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
I. Bakkenes, C. De Brabander, and J. Imants
Teacher Isolation and Communication Network Analysis in Primary Schools
Educational Administration Quarterly, April 1, 1999; 35(2): 166 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
M. D. Huft
Cross-Functional Working Relationships in Marketing
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, September 1, 1995; 23(4): 351 - 357.


Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
B. E. Ashforth and R. H. Humphrey
Emotion in the Workplace: A Reappraisal
Human Relations, February 1, 1995; 48(2): 97 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
B. Ashforth
Petty Tyranny in Organizations
Human Relations, July 1, 1994; 47(7): 755 - 778.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
J. Landau
Organizational Change and Barriers to Innovation: A Case Study in The Italian Public Sector
Human Relations, December 1, 1993; 46(12): 1411 - 1429.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Administration & SocietyHome page
B. E. Ashforth
The Perceived Inequity of Systems
Administration Society, November 1, 1992; 24(3): 375 - 408.
[Abstract]