Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rational Integration: Restoring Rationality to Organizational Analysis

Jonathan I. Klein

Graduate School of Management, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.

A "rational integration" model is proposed to explain why organizations, according to Allison (1971), tend to be mutually perceived as "rational actors" exhibiting goal consensus. It is suggested that the perception of rational action is attributable not merely to cognitive error but also to rational behaviors, performed both by elements of the perceived rational actor and by members of other organizations with which it transacts. The discussion addresses practical implications of rational integration, including problems and opportunities, and strategies for overcoming or exploiting them. The discussion also demonstrates how (1) the proposed model may enhance knowledge of organizations, and (2) research may contribute to this knowledge. Finally, by assigning causality to both "objective" social structure and the "subjective" perception of it, the proposed model can benefit social analysis in general by demonstrating an approach that integrates the structural and interpretive schools through a newly-proposed paradigm called "meta-structuralism. "

Human Relations, Vol. 43, No. 6, 527-550 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679004300603


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?