This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (31) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cohen, A. Articles by Lowenberg, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Re-examination of the Side-Bet Theory as Applied to Organizational Commitment: A Meta-Analysis

University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada.

Geula Lowenberg

University of Wisconsin-Parkside

Contradictory research findings make it almost impossible to arrive at generalized conclusions about the side-bet theory despite the amount of attention this theory has received. In an attempt to resolve the argument about the ability of the theory to explain the formation of organizational commitment, this study examines previous findings of relevant correlational data from 50 published studies, using the Hunter, Schmidt, and Jackson (1982) metaanalysis procedure. Results show that 11 side-bet variables have estimates of low population correlations with organizational commitment. For most of the side-bet variables, no meaningful or generalizable relationships with organizational commitment were found. The results indicate that there is very little empirical support for the side-bet theory. Three possible conclusions are proposed. Discussion of the implications of each conclusion and how they relate to future investigation of the side-bet theory concludes the paper.

Human Relations, Vol. 43, No. 10, 1015-1050 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/001872679004301005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Bayona-Saez, S. Goni-Legaz, and C. Madorran-Garcia How to raise commitment in public university lecturers International Review of Administrative Sciences, June 1, 2009; 75(2): 333 - 347. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. T. Kwantes Organizational Citizenship and Withdrawal Behaviors in the USA and India: Does Commitment Make a Difference? International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2003; 3(1): 5 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. Wallace Becker's Side-Bet Theory of Commitment Revisited: Is It Time for a Moratorium or a Resurrection? Human Relations, June 1, 1997; 50(6): 727 - 749. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. S. Reed, W. R. Young, and P. P. McHugh A Comparative Look at Dual Commitment: An International Study Human Relations, October 1, 1994; 47(10): 1269 - 1293. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. T. Liou Employee Commitment to the AIDS Service Organization: A Study of the Comprehensive AIDS Program in Palm Beach County, Florida The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 1994; 24(2): 193 - 205. [Abstract]

				P. V. MARSDEN, A. L. KALLEBERG, and C. R. COOK Gender Differences in Organizational Commitment: Influences of Work Positions and Family Roles Work and Occupations, August 1, 1993; 20(3): 368 - 390. [Abstract]

				A. Cohen and N. Hudecek Organizational Commitment-Turnover Relationship Across Occupational Groups: A Meta-Analysis Group Organization Management, June 1, 1993; 18(2): 188 - 213. [Abstract]