|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Relation to Work Performance and Turnover Intentions
Lynn McFarlane Shore
Georgia State University
Harry J. Martin
Cleveland State University
The differential associations that job satisfaction and organizational commitment have with job performance and turnover intentions were studied in a sample of bank tellers and hospital professionals. Results showed that organizational commitment was more strongly related than job satisfaction with turnover intentions for the tellers, but not for the professionals. Job satisfaction was related more strongly than organizational commitment with supervisory ratings of performance for both samples. The findings suggest that specific job attitudes are more closely associated with task-related out-comes such as performance ratings, whereas global organizational attitudes are more closely associated with organization-related outcomes like turnover intentions.
Human Relations, Vol. 42, No. 7,
625-638 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678904200705

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. D. Giffords
An Examination of Organizational Commitment and Professional Commitment and the Relationship to Work Environment, Demographic and Organizational Factors
Journal of Social Work,
October 1, 2009;
9(4):
386 - 404.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. W. H. Ng, K. L. Sorensen, and F. H. K. Yim
Does the Job Satisfaction--Job Performance Relationship Vary Across Cultures?
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
September 1, 2009;
40(5):
761 - 796.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Lee
Impact of Family Relationships on Attitudes of the Second Generation in Family Business
Family Business Review,
September 1, 2006;
19(3):
175 - 191.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P. Rothbard, K. W. Phillips, and T. L. Dumas
Managing Multiple Roles: Work-Family Policies and Individuals' Desires for Segmentation
Organization Science,
May 1, 2005;
16(3):
243 - 258.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Pittinsky and M. J. Shih
Knowledge Nomads: Organizational Commitment and Worker Mobility in Positive Perspective
American Behavioral Scientist,
February 1, 2004;
47(6):
791 - 807.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Yousef
Organizational Commitment as a Mediator of the Relationship between Islamic Work Ethic and Attitudes toward Organizational Change
Human Relations,
April 1, 2000;
53(4):
513 - 537.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Nyhan
Increasing Affective Organizational Commitment in Public Organizations: The Key Role of Interpersonal Trust
Review of Public Personnel Administration,
July 1, 1999;
19(3):
58 - 70.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Benkhoff
Ignoring Commitment Is Costly: New Approaches Establish the Missing Link Between Commitment and Performance
Human Relations,
June 1, 1997;
50(6):
701 - 726.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. B. Pullins, L. M. Fine, and W. L. Warren
Identifying Peer Mentors in the Sales Force: An Exploratory Investigation of Willingness and Ability
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
March 1, 1996;
24(2):
125 - 136.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. S. McCaul, V. B. Hinsz, and K. D. McCaul
Assessing Organizational Commitment: An Employee's Global Attitude toward the Organization
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
March 1, 1995;
31(1):
80 - 90.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Zeffane
Patterns of Organizational Commitment and Perceived Management Style: A Comparison of Public and Private Sector Employees
Human Relations,
August 1, 1994;
47(8):
977 - 1010.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Buchko
Employee Ownership, Attitudes, and Turnover: An Empirical Assessment
Human Relations,
July 1, 1992;
45(7):
711 - 733.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. P. Johnston III and W. E. Snizek
Combining Head and Heart in Complex Organizations: A Test of Etzioni's Dual Compliance Structure Hypothesis
Human Relations,
December 1, 1991;
44(12):
1255 - 1272.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|