Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Price, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Some Consequences of Turnover: A Work Unit Analysis

Charles W. Mueller

Department of Sociology, W140 Seashore Hall, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.

James L. Price

University of Iowa

In response to the recommendation that researchers examine the consequences of turnover instead of merely its determinants, we test nine hypotheses about how the turnover rate in organization work units influences integration, centralization, promotional opportunities, instrumental communication, job satisfaction, and behavioral commitment. Data from 115 work units in five organizations are studied using a longitudinal design which measures the impact of the work unit turnover rate for 8 months on the changes in the six variables over the 8-month period. After introducing numerous controls, turnover is found to have a net negative effect on instrumental communication and behavioral commitment. Implications for future research are discussed.

Human Relations, Vol. 42, No. 5, 389-402 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678904200502


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
C. R. Scott, S. L. Connaughton, H. R. Diaz-Saenz, K. Maguire, R. Ramirez, B. Richardson, S. P. Shaw, and D. Morgan
The Impacts of Communication and Multiple Identifications on Intent to Leave: A Multimethodological Exploration
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1999; 12(3): 400 - 435.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
R. Lichtenstein, J. A. Alexander, K. Jinnett, and E. Ullman
Embedded Intergroup Relations in Interdisciplinary Teams: Effects on Perceptions of Level of Team Integration
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1997; 33(4): 413 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. Alexander, B. Nuchols, J. Bloom, and S.-Y. Lee
Organizational Demography and Turnover: An Examination of Multiform and Nonlinear Heterogeneity
Human Relations, December 1, 1995; 48(12): 1455 - 1480.
[Abstract] [PDF]