This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (40) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dewel, P. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Examining the Nature of Work Stress: Individual Evaluations of Stressful Experiences and Coping

Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Business Studies, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Recent reviews of occupational stress research constantly emphasizes four important themes. These include the need to clarify what we mean by stress since how we define it influences how we research it and thus how we explain our results, the need to reconsider how we measure stressors, the need to explicity recognize the role of coping by developing measures of coping strategies, and the need to consider the role of alternative methodologies in investigating the stress process. Qualitative and quantitative methodologies are used to explore some of these issues. The results point to the value of using qualitative measures to assess the validity of current research practices. A number of issues emerge. When measuring work stressors, more attention should be given to such facets as intensity, frequency, and the meaning individuals attribute to events. Coping also influences individual meaning and future research should explore the nature of direct action and palliative strategies and more thoroughly investigate the appraisal process and its role in shaping stressful events.

Human Relations, Vol. 42, No. 11, 993-1013 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678904201103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Daniels, R. Hartley, and C. J. Travers Beliefs about stressors alter stressors' impact: Evidence from two experience-sampling studies Human Relations, September 1, 2006; 59(9): 1261 - 1285. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Daniels Book Reviews Human Relations, June 1, 2001; 54(6): 792 - 804. [PDF]

				S. Oakland and A. Ostell Measuring Coping: A Review and Critique Human Relations, February 1, 1996; 49(2): 133 - 155. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. I. Erera-Weatherley Coping with Stress: Public Welfare Supervisors Doing Their Best Human Relations, February 1, 1996; 49(2): 157 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Daniels and A. Guppy Occupational Stress, Social Support, Job Control, and Psychological Well-Being Human Relations, December 1, 1994; 47(12): 1523 - 1544. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Dewe Applying the Concept of Appraisal to Work Stressors: Some Exploratory Analysis Human Relations, February 1, 1992; 45(2): 143 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Reynolds and D. A. Shapiro Stress Reduction in Transition: Conceptual Problems in the Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Worksite Stress Management Interventions Human Relations, July 1, 1991; 44(7): 717 - 733. [Abstract] [PDF]