This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Leifer, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Understanding Organizational Transformation Using a Dissipative Structure Model

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Organizational transformation, qualitative and fundamental changes in an organization, occurs as a result of an organization's adaptive mechanisms being overwhelmed by internally or externally induced contingencies. Current approaches to change derived from equilibrium models are not adequate to describe the transformation phenomena. An emerging paradigm, dissipative structure, provides an alternative perspective on transformation by proposing that non-equilibrium conditions provide the opportunity for a new organizational order, resulting in an increased ability to manage complexity. Conditions, processes, and functioning of organizations from this perspective are discussed.

Human Relations, Vol. 42, No. 10, 899-916 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678904201003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Mishra, A. U. Bhaskar, and A. Khurana Development of Organizational Change Questionnaire Global Business Review, February 1, 2007; 8(1): 87 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. H. Chiles, A. D. Meyer, and T. J. Hench Organizational Emergence: The Origin and Transformation of Branson, Missouri's Musical Theaters Organization Science, September 1, 2004; 15(5): 499 - 519. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. M. B. Lichtenstein Generative Knowledge and Self-Organized Learning: Reflecting on Don Schon's Research Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2000; 9(1): 47 - 54. [PDF]

				K. M. Mathews, M. C. White, and R. G. Long Why Study the Complexity Sciences in the Social Sciences? Human Relations, April 1, 1999; 52(4): 439 - 462. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Mathews, M. C. White, and R. G. Long The Problem of Prediction and Control in Theoretical Diversity and the Promise of the Complexity Sciences Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 1999; 8(1): 17 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Wolfram Cox Manufacturing the Past: Loss and Absence in Organizational Change Organization Studies, January 1, 1997; 18(4): 623 - 654. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Smith and D. Comer Self-Organization in Small Groups: A Study of Group Effectiveness Within Non-Equilibrium Conditions Human Relations, May 1, 1994; 47(5): 553 - 581. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. Zimmerman and D. K. Hurst Breaking the Boundaries: The Fractal Organization Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 1993; 2(4): 334 - 355.

				H. Gregersen and L. Sailer Chaos Theory and Its Implications for Social Science Research Human Relations, July 1, 1993; 46(7): 777 - 802. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Smith and G. Gemmill Change in the Small Group: A Dissipative Structure Perspective Human Relations, July 1, 1991; 44(7): 697 - 716. [Abstract] [PDF]