Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yammarino, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Naughton, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Time Spent Communicating: A Multiple Levels of Analysis Approach

Francis J. Yammarino

School of Management, University Center at Binghamton, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York 13901.

Thomas J. Naughton

Wayne State University

Although prior studies have explored the association between time spent communicating and various antecedents and outcomes, differentiating among multiple levels of analysis in these investigations has been largely ignored. In this study, the relationships among time spent communicating and effort, satisfaction with work, and autonomy from a superior were assessed with an explicit consideration of multiple levels of analysisindividuals, work groups, and collectivities. Results from within and between analysis (WABA) procedures suggest that some effects were cross-level, aggregating to higher levels of analysis and varying across job-based collectivities and work groups. Other effects were level-specific, varying across work groups, but not aggregating to a higher level.

Human Relations, Vol. 41, No. 9, 655-676 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678804100902


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
F. J. Yammarino and T. J. Naughton
Individualized and Group-Based Views of Participation in Decision Making
Group Organization Management, December 1, 1992; 17(4): 398 - 413.
[Abstract]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
F. J. Yammarino and A. J. Dubinsky
Superior-Subordinate Relationships: A Multiple Levels of Analysis Approach
Human Relations, June 1, 1992; 45(6): 575 - 600.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. J. Avolio, F. J. Yammarino, and B. M. Bass
Identifying Common Methods Variance With Data Collected From A Single Source: An Unresolved Sticky Issue
Journal of Management, September 1, 1991; 17(3): 571 - 587.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
F. J. Yammarino and B. M. Bass
Transformational Leadership and Multiple Levels of Analysis
Human Relations, October 1, 1990; 43(10): 975 - 995.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
F. J. Yammarino and A. J. Dubinsky
Salesperson Performance and Managerially Controllable Factors: An Investigation of Individual and Work Group Effects
Journal of Management, March 1, 1990; 16(1): 87 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]