This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hassard, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Overcoming Hermeticism in Organization Theory: An Alternative to Paradigm Incommensurability

London Business School, Sussex Place, Regents Park, London NWI 4SA.

The paper discusses a major logical problem in recent organizational analysis the assumption that while paradigms are incommensurable, movement between them is nonproblematic, i.e., writers suggest paradigms are exclusive yet advocate interparadigm research (Ritzer, 1975; Burrell and Morgan, 1979; Pondy and Boje, 1981; Morgan, 1986). To make sense of this, and to establish an argument for paradigm mediation, we return to the origins of the debate in Kuhn's philosophy of science. In finding much equivocation in Kuhn, and especially in his debate with Popper, we draw upon the "later" Wittgenstein for facilitating Giddens' "relativity without relativism. " The analysis rejects both Kuhn's (1962) "strong" thesis of incommensurability and Popper's (1970) notion of liberal transions, in favor of a middle ground through Wittgenstein's (1953) "language-game of everyday life. "For organizational analysis, the paper argues for being "trained into" new paradigms, given the premise that "unorganized experience cannot order perception" (Phillips, 1977).

Human Relations, Vol. 41, No. 3, 247-259 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678804100304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Hassard and M. Kelemen Production and Consumption in Organizational Knowledge: The Case of the `Paradigms Debate' Organization, May 1, 2002; 9(2): 331 - 355. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Zietsma The Present through the Eyes of the Past... A Play Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2002; 11(1): 8 - 12. [PDF]

				C. Hardy On the Edge of a Pluralistic World Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2002; 11(1): 16 - 18. [PDF]

				S. Lowe In the Kingdom of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is King International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, December 1, 2001; 1(3): 313 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. Scherer and H. Steinmann Some Remarks on the Problem of Incommensurability in Organization Studies Organization Studies, May 1, 1999; 20(3): 519 - 544. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. Scherer Pluralism and Incommensurability in Strategic Management and Organization Theory: A Problem in Search of a Solution Organization, May 1, 1998; 5(2): 147 - 168. [Abstract]

				J. Hassard Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: A Case Study Organization Studies, January 1, 1991; 12(2): 275 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Parker and G. McHugh Five Texts in Search of an Author: A Response to John Hassard's 'Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis' Organization Studies, January 1, 1991; 12(3): 451 - 456. [PDF]

				R. Holland The Paradigm Plague: Prevention, Cure, and Inoculation Human Relations, January 1, 1990; 43(1): 23 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]