Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baburoglu, O. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Vortical Environment: The Fifth in the Emery-Trist Levels of Organizational Environments

Oguz N. Baburoglu

The School of Management, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13676.

The paper develops a conceptual scheme that has not been developed to extend the Emery-Trist levels of organizational environments to afifth level consistent with premises laid in their milestone paper (Emery & Trist, 1965). The mounting contemporary evidence that can be observed in the salience of maladaptive responses to turbulent environments is the second reason for undertaking this challenge. More specifically, it is argued that the prevalence of stalemate, polarization, and monothematic dogmatism, the second-order maladaptive responses to the turbulent environment, leads to a frozen or a clinched order of connectedness as well as that of unevenly dynamic turbulent conditions. This approach facilitates the articulation of a different causal texture of an organizational environment than the previous four levels (placid random, placid clustered, disturbed reactive, and turbulent).

Human Relations, Vol. 41, No. 3, 181-210 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678804100301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
J. W. Selsky, J. Goes, and O. N. Baburoglu
Contrasting Perspectives of Strategy Making: Applications in 'Hyper' Environments
Organization Studies, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 71 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
Postscript: The Next Thirty Years-A Short Reflection
Human Relations, August 1, 1997; 50(8): 931 - 935.
[PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
J. W. Selsky and S. Creahan
The Exploitation of Common Property Natural Resources: A Social Ecology Perspective
Organization Environment, September 1, 1996; 9(3): 346 - 375.
[Abstract]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
R. Leifer
Understanding Organizational Transformation Using a Dissipative Structure Model
Human Relations, October 1, 1989; 42(10): 899 - 916.
[Abstract] [PDF]