This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fiorelli, J. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Power in Work Groups: Team Member's Perspectives

Planning and Administration, Information Services Division, Corning Glass Works, Houghton Park CB 04 004, Corning, New York 14831.

Power and restrictive participation are often identified as primary issues which can retard the productivity of work groups. The study describes team member responses to a questionnaire regarding bases of social power used within 19 interdisciplinary clinical team meetings and their relationship with team decision-making style, participation in team decisions, and team meeting productivity. Physicians were found to effect almost all treatment decisions, and autocratic decision making was found to be more prevalent than consensual decision making. It is suggested that the generally held belief that the interdisciplinary team approach is equivalent with shared decision making and broad-based participation needs careful re-examination. Implications of the findings for shared decision making in health care teams and work groups in general are discussed. The importance for managers and team leaders to understand and appropriately facilitate the dynamics of power in work groups is emphasized.

Human Relations, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1-12 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678804100101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Lemieux-Charles and W. L. McGuire What Do We Know about Health Care Team Effectiveness? A Review of the Literature Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2006; 63(3): 263 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Karakowsky, K. McBey, and D. L. Miller Gender, Perceived Competence, and Power Displays: Examining Verbal Interruptions in a Group Context Small Group Research, August 1, 2004; 35(4): 407 - 439. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Niederman and R. J. Volkema The Effects of Facilitator Characteristics on Meeting Preparation, Set Up, and Implementation Small Group Research, June 1, 1999; 30(3): 330 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Teram A Case Against Making the Control of Clients a Negotiable Contingency for Interdisciplinary Teams Human Relations, February 1, 1999; 52(2): 263 - 278. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Kolb Let's Bring Structure Back: A Commentary Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 1996; 9(4): 452 - 465. [Abstract]

				A. Sinclair The Tyranny of a Team Ideology Organization Studies, January 1, 1992; 13(4): 611 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Teram Interdisciplinary Teams and the Control of Clients: A Sociotechnical Perspective Human Relations, April 1, 1991; 44(4): 343 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Handy Stress and Contradiction in Psychiatric Nursing Human Relations, January 1, 1991; 44(1): 39 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Lazega Internal Politics and the Interactive Elaboration of Information in Workgroups: An Exploratory Study Human Relations, January 1, 1990; 43(1): 87 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. K. Nash Public Law 99-457: Facilitating Family Participation on the Multidisciplinary Team Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1990; 14(4): 318 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF]