This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Newton, T. J. Articles by Keenan, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Coping with Work-Related Stress

University of Edinburgh, and Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh

A. Keenan

University of Edinburgh, and Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh

This study examined the coping behavior of a sample of young professional engineers in response to stress "incidents" experienced at work. Subjects were specifically asked to limit their recall to an incident occurring within the preceding 14 days. A primary analysis was made of the coping behavior exhibited, from which five classes of coping behavior were derived. Coping behavior was then examined in relation to the subjective appraisal of the stress encountered, and to characteristics of both the individual experiencing the stress and of the work environment in which it occurred. Analysis indicated that all three predictor groups (stress appraisal, individual, and envrionmental characteristics) were important in relation to the coping behaivor reported. Evidence also emerged suggesting that certain types of coping response are behavior correlates of particular individual characteristics, whereas others were more likely to be related to differences in the environmental context and to the way in which the stress incident is appraised. The results question the relevance of attempts to derive "effective" coping techniques which can be applied universally regardless of differences between individuals or environments. In addition, they do not support a theoretical emphasis upon the subjective appraisal of stress as primary in modeling coping behavior, since individual and environmental characteristics appear to be equally important and may directly effect the range and choice of coping options available.

Human Relations, Vol. 38, No. 2, 107-126 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678503800202


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. J. Dewe Applying the Concept of Appraisal to Work Stressors: Some Exploratory Analysis Human Relations, February 1, 1992; 45(2): 143 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. J. Newton and A. Keenan The Moderating Effect of the Type A Behavior Pattern and Locus of Control upon the Relationship Between Change in Job Demands and Change in Psychological Strain Human Relations, December 1, 1990; 43(12): 1229 - 1255. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Edwards, A. J. Baglioni Jr., and C. L. Cooper Stress, Type-A, Coping, and Psychological and Physical Symptoms: A Multi-Sample Test of Alternative Models Human Relations, October 1, 1990; 43(10): 919 - 956. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Dewel Examining the Nature of Work Stress: Individual Evaluations of Stressful Experiences and Coping Human Relations, November 1, 1989; 42(11): 993 - 1013. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. J. Newton Occupational Stress and Coping with Stress: A Critique Human Relations, May 1, 1989; 42(5): 441 - 461. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. M. Puffer and J. T. Brakefield The Role of Task Complexity as a Moderator of the Stress and Coping Process Human Relations, March 1, 1989; 42(3): 199 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Kabanoff and G. E. O'Brien Stress and the Leisure Needs and Activities of Different Occupations Human Relations, October 1, 1986; 39(10): 903 - 916. [Abstract] [PDF]