Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ivancevich, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Matteson, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Type A-B Person-Work Environment Interaction Model for Examining Occupational Stress and Consequences

John M. Ivancevich

University of Houston

Michael T. Matteson

University of Houston

The physiological, psychological, and organizational effects of occupational stress are not only costly to individual employees and managers, but also to the organization, society, and family. This paper examines the notion of interaction between the employee and the work environment. Stress is defined in terms of a relationship between a person and the work environment. Instead of using a global model of person-environment interaction, a more specific approach incorporating the notion of Type A-B behavior pattern and Type A-B work environment is developed. The paper examines the theory, research, and implications of a person-environment model as an explanation of occupational stress and various behavioral, psychological, and organizational consequences. The model is suggested as a formulation of a dynamic-interactional view that emphasizes the reciprocal person-environment processes found in the workplace. It is proposed that the interaction between Type A-B behavior patterns and Type A-B work environment is a fertile area for further theoretical and empirical research.

Human Relations, Vol. 37, No. 7, 491-513 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678403700701


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
K. G. Lamude and J. Scudder
Compliance-Gaining Techniques of Type-A Managers
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 1993; 30(1): 63 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Jamal and V. V. Baba
Type A Behavior, Its Prevalence and Consequences Among Women Nurses: An Empirical Examination
Human Relations, October 1, 1991; 44(11): 1213 - 1228.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Jamal
Relationship of Job Stress and Type-A Behavior to Employees' Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Psychosomatic Health Problems, and Turnover Motivation
Human Relations, August 1, 1990; 43(8): 727 - 738.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
K. L. Froggatt and J. L. Cotton
The Impact of Type A Behavior Pattern on Role Overload-induced Stress and Performance Attributions
Journal of Management, March 1, 1987; 13(1): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
C. R. Greer and M. A. D. Castro
The Relationship Between Perceived Unit Effectiveness and Occupational Stress: The Case of Purchasing Agents
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, April 1, 1986; 22(2): 159 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]