This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cunningham, J. B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Gathering Data in a Changing Organization

School of Public Administration, University of Victoria

A common feature in the assessment of on-going programs is the use of intuition and common sense in selecting and analyzing evidence. Although intuition nay provide rich insights into a specific situation, there is no way to ascertain whether the intuition represents good judgment or good politics. This article describes one means of selecting and analyzing evidence for assessing changing situations, and offers a procedure that light improve research on action-related problems.

Human Relations, Vol. 36, No. 5, 403-420 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678303600501


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. L. ANDERSON and K. HERR The New Paradigm Wars: Is There Room for Rigorous Practitioner Knowledge in Schools and Universities? Educational Researcher, June 1, 1999; 28(5): 12 - 40. [PDF]

				J. Friend, D. Bryant, B. Cunningham, and J. Luckman Negotiated Project Engagements: Learning from Experience Human Relations, December 1, 1998; 51(12): 1509 - 1542. [Abstract]