Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piper, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cohesion as a Basic Bond in Groups

William E. Piper

McGill University and Allan Memorial Institute, Montreal, Quebec

Myriam Marrache

Acadia University

Renee Lacroix

Queen's University

Astrid M. Richardsen

McGill University

Barry D. Jones

Allan Memorial Institute, Montreal, Quebec

Cohesion continues to remain a popular concept among group therapists and leaders of experientially based learning groups despite persistent confusion about its meaning. The present study provided an empirical basis for clarification of the concept of cohesion. Forty-five participants from nine experientially based learning groups provided self-report and behavioral data concerning a number of aspects of cohesion. Factor analyses of the self-report data generated three sets of factors that dealt with the participant's perception of the other participants, the leader, and the group as a whole. One of the factors concerned the participant's commitment to the group. It was significantly related to remaining in the group and physical distance to others but not to perceptions of learning. It was regarded as a good representation of cohesion as defined as a basic bond or uniting force in a group. The advantages of restricting oneself to a circumscribed definition of cohesion were emphasized as well as maintaining distinctions between cohesion and other concepts.

Human Relations, Vol. 36, No. 2, 93-108 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678303600201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Family Business ReviewHome page
M. C. Vallejo
Analytical Model of Leadership in Family Firms Under Transformational Theoretical Approach: An Exploratory Study
Family Business Review, June 1, 2009; 22(2): 136 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
B. Beadnell, S. K. Carlisle, M. J. Hoppe, K. A. Mariano, A. Wilsdon, D. M. Morrison, E. A. Wells, M. R. Gillmore, and D. Higa
The Reliability and Validity of a Group-Based Measure of Adolescents' Friendship Closeness
Research on Social Work Practice, November 1, 2007; 17(6): 707 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
M. J. Hornsey, L. Dwyer, and T. P. S. Oei
Beyond Cohesiveness: Reconceptualizing the Link Between Group Processes and Outcomes in Group Psychotherapy
Small Group Research, October 1, 2007; 38(5): 567 - 592.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. Pena, J. B. Walther, and J. T. Hancock
Effects of Geographic Distribution on Dominance Perceptions in Computer-Mediated Groups
Communication Research, June 1, 2007; 34(3): 313 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. Pincus and S. J. Guastello
Nonlinear Dynamics and Interpersonal Correlates of Verbal Turn-Taking Patterns in a Group Therapy Session
Small Group Research, December 1, 2005; 36(6): 635 - 677.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AffiliaHome page
M. K. Kumsa
Negotiating Intimacies in a Globalized Space: Identity and Cohesion in Young Oromo Refugee Women
Affilia, November 1, 2002; 17(4): 471 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group AnalysisHome page
S. Lorentzen
Assessment of Change after Long-Term Psychoanalytic Group Treatment: Presentation of a Field Study of Outpatients from Private Psychiatric Practice
Group Analysis, September 1, 2000; 33(3): 373 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
B. L. Kirkman and D. L. Shapiro
Understanding Why Team Members Won't Share: An Examination of Factors Related to Employee Receptivity to Team-Based Rewards
Small Group Research, April 1, 2000; 31(2): 175 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Carless and C. De Paola
The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams
Small Group Research, February 1, 2000; 31(1): 71 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. A. Carless
Reply to Carron and Brawley
Small Group Research, February 1, 2000; 31(1): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
K. B. Henry, H. Arrow, and B. Carini
A Tripartite Model of Group Identification: Theory and Measurement
Small Group Research, October 1, 1999; 30(5): 558 - 581.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
J. J. Corbin
A Study of Factors Influencing the Growth of Nonprofits in Social Services
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, September 1, 1999; 28(3): 296 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
M. H. Bond and W. Y.-F. Shiu
The Relationship between a Group's Personality Resources and the Two Dimensions of Its Group Process
Small Group Research, May 1, 1997; 28(2): 194 - 217.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. A. Cota, C. R. Evans, K. L. Dion, L. Kilik, and R. S. Longman
The Structure of Group Cohesion
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1995; 21(6): 572 - 580.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. A. Prentice, D. T. Miller, and J. R. Lightdale
Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to their Members: Distinguishing between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1994; 20(5): 484 - 493.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. A. Cota, K. L. Dion, and C. R. Evans
A Reexamination of the Structure of the Gross Cohesiveness Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1993; 53(2): 499 - 506.
[Abstract]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
L. B. Rosenfeld and J. R. Gilbert
The Measurement of Cohesion and its Relationship to Dimensions of Self-Disclosure in Classroom Settings
Small Group Research, August 1, 1989; 20(3): 291 - 301.
[Abstract]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
P. E. Mudrack
Defining Group Cohesiveness: A Legacy of Confusion?
Small Group Research, February 1, 1989; 20(1): 37 - 49.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. E. Gist, E. A. Locke, and M. S. Taylor
Organizational Behavior: Group Structure, Process, and Effectiveness
Journal of Management, June 1, 1987; 13(2): 237 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
A. M. Richardsen and W. E. Piper
Leader Style, Leader Consistency, and Participant Personality Effects on Learning in Small Groups
Human Relations, September 1, 1986; 39(9): 817 - 836.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
S. Drescher, G. Burlingame, and A. Fuhriman
Cohesion: An Odyssey in Empirical Understanding
Small Group Research, February 1, 1985; 16(1): 3 - 30.
[Abstract]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
W. E. Piper, B. D. Jones, R. Lacroix, M. Marrache, and A. M. Richardsen
Pregroup Interactions and Bonding in Small Groups
Small Group Research, February 1, 1984; 15(1): 51 - 62.
[Abstract]