Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liebowitz, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by de Meuse, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Application of Team Building

S. Jay Liebowitz

University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916.

Kenneth P. de Meuse

University of Tennessee at Knoxville

This paper reviews the literature on the organization development strategy known as team building. Included are a definition and conceptualization of team building, a comparison of team building with laboratory training, a series of assumptions underlying the strategy, the major purposes of team building, and a description of several models of team building. In addition, the process of team building is presented; the steps in the team building process are outlined, a variety of techniques for problem diagnosis and solution generation are listed, and the roles played by the team building consultant are reviewed. Further, several important prerequisites to enhance the probability of success of team building interventions are considered. Finally, the utility of team building is discussed.

Human Relations, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1-18 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/001872678203500102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
T. P. Moses and A. J. Stahelski
A Productivity Evaluation of Teamwork at an Aluminum Manufacturing Plant
Group Organization Management, September 1, 1999; 24(3): 391 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
S. R. Glaser
Teamwork and Communication: A 3-Year Case Study of Change
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1994; 7(3): 282 - 296.
[Abstract]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. F. Veigal
The Frequency of Self-Limiting Behavior in Groups: A Measure and an Explanation
Human Relations, August 1, 1991; 44(8): 877 - 895.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
R. B. Polley
Intervention and Cultural Context: Mediation in the US and Norway
Journal of Management, December 1, 1988; 14(4): 617 - 629.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. E. Gist, E. A. Locke, and M. S. Taylor
Organizational Behavior: Group Structure, Process, and Effectiveness
Journal of Management, June 1, 1987; 13(2): 237 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
J. I. Porras and S. J. Hoffer
Common Behavior Changes in Successful Organization Development Efforts
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, October 1, 1986; 22(4): 477 - 494.
[Abstract] [PDF]